2019
DOI: 10.4103/ajns.ajns_78_19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local cerebral hemodynamics after superficial temporal artery-middle cerebral artery bypass in patients with symptomatic carotid occlusions

Abstract: Context: Physiological insights into blood flow alterations in cortical vessels after superficial temporal artery-middle cerebral artery (STA-MCA) bypass surgery are important for the prognosis of bypass sustainability and hemodynamic patency. Aims: This study aims to assess the impact of STA-MCA bypass on local hemodynamics for patients with symptomatic carotid occlusions and Moyamoya disease. Settings and Design: This article presents a pro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study also revisits the arterial pressure dynamics between the donor STA and the systemic circulation. Consistent with the findings of Shulgina et al, we also observed that the mean arterial pressure in the donor STA was 3.4 mmHg marginally lower than the systemic blood pressure recorded via intraoperative radial artery monitoring [ 27 ]. This supports the feasibility of predicting mean donor artery pressure in STA-MCA bypass patients without the need for direct measurement.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The study also revisits the arterial pressure dynamics between the donor STA and the systemic circulation. Consistent with the findings of Shulgina et al, we also observed that the mean arterial pressure in the donor STA was 3.4 mmHg marginally lower than the systemic blood pressure recorded via intraoperative radial artery monitoring [ 27 ]. This supports the feasibility of predicting mean donor artery pressure in STA-MCA bypass patients without the need for direct measurement.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%