Abstract:The local level and private actors play an important role in the implementation of climate change adaptation. The engagement of the private sector and citizens has received increasing attention in recent years. Local authorities' choice of policy instruments, the distribution of responsibilities, and the benefits of adaptation as a public or a private good have a bearing on the involvement of private actors. Based on interviews and documents from Copenhagen and Helsinki, we analyse how public authorities' choi… Show more
“…This increased "responsibilisation" of citizens -transferring the burden of risk and responsibility to citizens- (Klein, Juhola, & Landauer, 2017;O'Hare, White, & Connelly, 2015;Roth & Prior, 2014;Wamsler, 2016) has implications for the roles of governments. This increased "responsibilisation" of citizens -transferring the burden of risk and responsibility to citizens- (Klein, Juhola, & Landauer, 2017;O'Hare, White, & Connelly, 2015;Roth & Prior, 2014;Wamsler, 2016) has implications for the roles of governments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Citizens can contribute by taking adaptation measures in and around the house Tompkins & Eakin, 2012). Nevertheless, empirical manifestations of this shift of responsibilities to citizens and other nonstate actors are still limited in adaptation (e.g., Klein et al, 2017;Klein et al, 2018;Mees, 2017;Mees et al, 2016). Consequently, conceptual understandings of what "facilitating" and "enabling" roles for governments might entail in the adaptation domain are in an embryonic stage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Citizen coproduction presumes a shift of responsibilities for public goods and services away from or in addition to governments and businesses, towards citizens. This increased "responsibilisation" of citizens -transferring the burden of risk and responsibility to citizens- (Klein, Juhola, & Landauer, 2017;O'Hare, White, & Connelly, 2015;Roth & Prior, 2014;Wamsler, 2016) has implications for the roles of governments. These government roles do not necessarily diminish or become obsolete, but they shift from a regulating and steering towards a more collaborative, responsive government (Aylett, 2013;Bekkers et al, 2014;Denhardt & Denhardt, 2000;Gilbert, 2005) that enables and facilitates community initiatives in which nonstate actors play prominent roles.…”
Citizens' initiatives for climate action are actively encouraged by governments to enhance the resilience of communities to climate change. This increased responsibilisation of citizens has implications for the roles of governments. The degree of government involvement does not necessarily decline, but government roles may need to shift: from a regulating and steering government towards a more collaborative and responsive government that enables and facilitates community initiatives that are self-governed by citizens. However, we lack a conceptual understanding of such new government roles, as well as empirical insights into how local governments participate in citizens' initiatives and how they take up such new roles.In this paper, a "ladder of government participation" is introduced, which is used to explore the roles of local governments in citizens' initiatives for climate change adaptation in the Netherlands. The results show that local governments are slowly but gradually shifting towards more networking, stimulating, and facilitating roles. Key concerns of local practitioners are (a) a lack of flexibility and support of their own municipal organisation to facilitate citizens' initiatives, (b) uncertainty about the continuity of citizens' initiatives over time, and (c) a potential increase of inequity among citizen groups resulting from facilitating citizens' initiatives. An important finding is that the roles of local governments tend to be flexible, in that they can move from one role to the other over time for one and the same citizens' initiative depending on its stage of development, as well as take up several roles simultaneously for different citizens' initiatives.This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
“…This increased "responsibilisation" of citizens -transferring the burden of risk and responsibility to citizens- (Klein, Juhola, & Landauer, 2017;O'Hare, White, & Connelly, 2015;Roth & Prior, 2014;Wamsler, 2016) has implications for the roles of governments. This increased "responsibilisation" of citizens -transferring the burden of risk and responsibility to citizens- (Klein, Juhola, & Landauer, 2017;O'Hare, White, & Connelly, 2015;Roth & Prior, 2014;Wamsler, 2016) has implications for the roles of governments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Citizens can contribute by taking adaptation measures in and around the house Tompkins & Eakin, 2012). Nevertheless, empirical manifestations of this shift of responsibilities to citizens and other nonstate actors are still limited in adaptation (e.g., Klein et al, 2017;Klein et al, 2018;Mees, 2017;Mees et al, 2016). Consequently, conceptual understandings of what "facilitating" and "enabling" roles for governments might entail in the adaptation domain are in an embryonic stage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Citizen coproduction presumes a shift of responsibilities for public goods and services away from or in addition to governments and businesses, towards citizens. This increased "responsibilisation" of citizens -transferring the burden of risk and responsibility to citizens- (Klein, Juhola, & Landauer, 2017;O'Hare, White, & Connelly, 2015;Roth & Prior, 2014;Wamsler, 2016) has implications for the roles of governments. These government roles do not necessarily diminish or become obsolete, but they shift from a regulating and steering towards a more collaborative, responsive government (Aylett, 2013;Bekkers et al, 2014;Denhardt & Denhardt, 2000;Gilbert, 2005) that enables and facilitates community initiatives in which nonstate actors play prominent roles.…”
Citizens' initiatives for climate action are actively encouraged by governments to enhance the resilience of communities to climate change. This increased responsibilisation of citizens has implications for the roles of governments. The degree of government involvement does not necessarily decline, but government roles may need to shift: from a regulating and steering government towards a more collaborative and responsive government that enables and facilitates community initiatives that are self-governed by citizens. However, we lack a conceptual understanding of such new government roles, as well as empirical insights into how local governments participate in citizens' initiatives and how they take up such new roles.In this paper, a "ladder of government participation" is introduced, which is used to explore the roles of local governments in citizens' initiatives for climate change adaptation in the Netherlands. The results show that local governments are slowly but gradually shifting towards more networking, stimulating, and facilitating roles. Key concerns of local practitioners are (a) a lack of flexibility and support of their own municipal organisation to facilitate citizens' initiatives, (b) uncertainty about the continuity of citizens' initiatives over time, and (c) a potential increase of inequity among citizen groups resulting from facilitating citizens' initiatives. An important finding is that the roles of local governments tend to be flexible, in that they can move from one role to the other over time for one and the same citizens' initiative depending on its stage of development, as well as take up several roles simultaneously for different citizens' initiatives.This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
“…This service relies on market mechanisms and puts citizens and private companies in the role of customers that can purchase this service. However, the ability to purchase this service depends on the availability of the cooling network and the financial resources of private actors (Klein et al, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far, the public sector and municipal administration have been considered the main actors in urban adaptation in Europe, more specifically in Northern Europe, while a strong involvement of private actors in urban adaptation as such is relatively new but slowly emerging (Bedsted & Gram, ; City of Copenhagen, ; European Environment Agency, ; ICLEI, ; Juhola, ; Klein, Landauer, & Juhola, ; Lonkila, ; Wamsler & Brink, ). For example, much of the decision‐making responsibility was shifted from the public sector to a private developer in the development of the Stadshaven in Rotterdam (Root, van der Krabben, & Spit, ), or citizens' involvement has been emphasized in the redevelopment of the Skt.…”
This qualitative study examines how administrative traditions and governance in two cities, New York City and Helsinki, have affected the interplay of public administration, the private sector, and citizens in climate change adaptation. The results show that both cities aim for an increased state-market-civil society interaction. However, their efforts have different points of departure and follow different trajectories. New York City's administration is within the Anglo-American tradition of state-market dualism, while the state-market-civil society interaction for adaptation is coordinated by newly created administrative organizations. This interaction has to be accommodated to the strong reliance on market mechanisms. Helsinki's administration has its roots in the welfare state administration with a strong role of the public administration. Increased state-market-civil society interaction results in a reduced influence of the public sector and the reliance on ad hoc projects and informal modes of cross-sectoral cooperation.
Transformative adaptation is described as decisive to mitigating risks and to seizing opportunities from a changing climate, requiring new ways of governing, planning and collaborating, alongside technical innovations. Building municipal capacities for citizen participation in adaptation is important to enabling such transformational changes but remains challenging. By applying capacities distilled from the literature on Urban Transformative Capacity and Participatory Climate Governance in a Swedish municipal case, this study aims to disentangle key limits for, and innovations to strengthen, local capacities for citizen participation in transformative climate adaptation. Interviews with municipal officials, focus groups with citizens, and document analyses were employed to analyse how climate adaptation and citizen participation are governed, and how these policy areas are interacting and could be bridged. The study points at conditions that foremost prevent bridging established policies and practices on adaptation and citizen participation, stemming from the different logics and distribution of responsibility within, and lacking collaboration between, these separated policy areas. The analysis concludes that potential ways to enable citizen participation in adaptation involve: broadening the geographical boundaries of deliberations; redefining the target groups for participation; co‐designing participation targets, approaches and evaluation; and developing new ways to analyse and act on the patterns in the citizen inputs received.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.