2013
DOI: 10.1111/jeb.12289
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local adaptation to salinity in the three‐spined stickleback?

Abstract: Different lines of evidence suggest that the occurrence and extent of local adaptation in high gene flow marine environments -even in mobile and long-lived vertebrates with complex life cycles -may be more widespread than earlier thought. We conducted a common garden experiment to test for local adaptation to salinity in Baltic Sea sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus). Fish from three different native salinity regimes (high, mid and low) were subjected to three salinity treatments (high, mid and low) in a ful… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
67
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
4
67
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This scenario has likely been repeated over many years and creates the potential for gene flow that would inhibit phenotypic divergence simply by drift (30,(63)(64)(65)(66). The clearly discontinuous trait distributions between ecotypes are therefore most likely due to strong divergent selection on the phenotypes in the alternative oceanic and freshwater habitats, in agreement with other studies of selection in artificially seeded stickleback populations (38,50,(67)(68)(69). The strength of selection (s) on the region containing Eda-the locus associated with lateral plate loss (35,36,70)-in oceanic stickleback transplanted to artificial freshwater ponds was found to be 0.52 (47,69,71).…”
Section: Phenotypic Differentiation Supports a Role For Strong Divergentsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…This scenario has likely been repeated over many years and creates the potential for gene flow that would inhibit phenotypic divergence simply by drift (30,(63)(64)(65)(66). The clearly discontinuous trait distributions between ecotypes are therefore most likely due to strong divergent selection on the phenotypes in the alternative oceanic and freshwater habitats, in agreement with other studies of selection in artificially seeded stickleback populations (38,50,(67)(68)(69). The strength of selection (s) on the region containing Eda-the locus associated with lateral plate loss (35,36,70)-in oceanic stickleback transplanted to artificial freshwater ponds was found to be 0.52 (47,69,71).…”
Section: Phenotypic Differentiation Supports a Role For Strong Divergentsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…In addition, common garden experiments are also used to study the consequences of local adaptation for conservation (McKay et al, 2001) or even for ecosystem functioning (Bassar et al, 2010). Despite its name, and although it has been used extensively with plants (Linhart and Grant, 1996), this experimental approach can also be applied to a large variety of organisms including fish (Bassar et al, 2010;DeFaveri and Merilä, 2014), invertebrates (Spitze, 1993;Luttikhuizen et al, 2003) and small mammals (Bozinovic et al, 2009). The main limitations to this experimental design are the ability to breed the species and to grow the produced offspring in laboratory or seminatural conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Local adaptation might be suspected because of the existence of an environmental gradient such as latitude (Toräng et al, 2015) or altitude (Alberto et al, 2011), or because of the existence of several contrasting environments, such as sea and fresh water (DeFaveri and Merilä, 2014). In addition, common garden experiments are also used to study the consequences of local adaptation for conservation (McKay et al, 2001) or even for ecosystem functioning (Bassar et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If differences between field-collected populations persist under standard conditions, local adaptation is then implicated as the most important adaptive strategy. Interpretations of local adaptation can be challenged because forces other than selection (e.g., drift) can also lead to genetic differentiation (Kawecki and Ebert, 2004); thus, comparative evaluations of quantitative (Q ST ) under common-garden conditions and neutral (F ST ) estimators of genetic differentiation can be applied to test whether the observed population divergence exceeds that expected by genetic drift alone (Defaveri and Merilä, 2014). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%