Abstract:Spatial variation in environmental conditions can lead to local adaptation of plant populations, particularly if gene flow among populations is low. Many studies have investigated adaptation to contrasting environmental conditions, but little is known about the spatial scale of adaptive evolution. We studied population differentiation and local adaptation at two spatial scales in the monocarpic grassland perennial Carlina vulgaris. We reciprocally transplanted seedlings among five European regions (northwester… Show more
“…The creation of new populations in suitable habitats within the different regions might thus be considered. Because of the significant clines in non-neutral markers, seeds from the same region should be used to avoid potential maladaptation to local conditions (Becker et al 2006(Becker et al , 2008.…”
We used RAPD markers to study the population genetic structure and diversity of Saxifraga rosacea subsp. sponhemica, a rare Central European endemic rock plant with a highly disjunct distribution. Because of strong isolation current gene flow between populations is very low or absent. However, an isolation by distance pattern of genetic differentiation suggested historical gene flow during the last glaciation when suitable habitats for S. sponhemica were much more abundant. In most populations, considerable genetic variability has been preserved due to the longevity of S. sponhemica. Our results suggest that long-lived plant species can maintain historic genetic patterns despite small size and strong isolation of populations. Several RAPD loci were identified to be non-neutral and their frequencies correlated with climatic gradients, indicating natural selection. Adaptive genetic variation could be important for adaptation to environmental changes like ongoing climate change. The taxon does not appear to be genetically threatened in the short term, but populations are threatened by habitat destruction. The establishment of new populations in suitable habitats with seeds from the same region may be a suitable conservation measure avoiding potential maladaptation due to local adaptation.
“…The creation of new populations in suitable habitats within the different regions might thus be considered. Because of the significant clines in non-neutral markers, seeds from the same region should be used to avoid potential maladaptation to local conditions (Becker et al 2006(Becker et al , 2008.…”
We used RAPD markers to study the population genetic structure and diversity of Saxifraga rosacea subsp. sponhemica, a rare Central European endemic rock plant with a highly disjunct distribution. Because of strong isolation current gene flow between populations is very low or absent. However, an isolation by distance pattern of genetic differentiation suggested historical gene flow during the last glaciation when suitable habitats for S. sponhemica were much more abundant. In most populations, considerable genetic variability has been preserved due to the longevity of S. sponhemica. Our results suggest that long-lived plant species can maintain historic genetic patterns despite small size and strong isolation of populations. Several RAPD loci were identified to be non-neutral and their frequencies correlated with climatic gradients, indicating natural selection. Adaptive genetic variation could be important for adaptation to environmental changes like ongoing climate change. The taxon does not appear to be genetically threatened in the short term, but populations are threatened by habitat destruction. The establishment of new populations in suitable habitats with seeds from the same region may be a suitable conservation measure avoiding potential maladaptation due to local adaptation.
“…Currently, much research is novel, small scale and short term (Robertson & Hull 2001). The few large-scale studies (Becker, Colling, Dostal, Jakobsson, & Matthies 2006;Becker, Reinhold, & Matthies 2006;Bischoff et al 2006a;Joshi et al 2001) are also time limited. In particular, further information on the loss of diversity during propagation in stock is required.…”
Section: Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Becker, Colling, Dostal, Jakobsson, & Matthies 2006;Etterson 2004;Joshi et al 2001). Climate has been identified as the main driver of selection at such large scales but other environmental factors that show large-scale patterns may also act as diverging selective forces (Etterson 2004;Joshi et al 2001;Macel et al 2007;Santamaria et al 2003).…”
Native plant species are routinely planted or sown in ecological restoration projects, but successful establishment and survival depend on where and how seeds are collected. Research suggests that it is important to use locally adapted seeds. Local populations often show a home-site advantage and non-local genotypes may be maladapted to local environmental conditions. Furthermore, intraspecific hybridisation of local and non-local genotypes may have a negative impact on the genetic structure of local populations via mechanisms such as outbreeding depression. Many species show a strong small-scale genetic differentiation between different habitats so that matching habitats of the restoration and donor site can be more important than minimizing geographical separation. It is a challenge to identify appropriate seed sources because strong small-scale population differentiation makes it difficult to delineate geographically defined seed zones to which seed exchange should be limited. Moreover, it is important to consider the genetic diversity of introduced material because it may be crucial to avoid genetic bottlenecks, inbreeding depression and poor establishment of plant populations. Repeated propagation in stock, which is often required to obtain a sufficient amount of seeds, can further reduce genetic diversity and may select for particular genotypes. Negative impacts of improper seed choice for nursery planting stock may become detectable only after many years, especially in long-lived and slow growing plants. Although scientific information on many species remains limited, the increasing demand for translocation of seed means that mandatory regulations are necessary. Guidelines should prescribe a specification of seed provenance, a record of genetic diversity of wild collections and rules for subsequent processing such as direct transfer and propagation of stock or seed orchards. We use a literature review to evaluate current legislation and to develop recommendations for herbaceous and woody species.
For restoration purposes, nature conservation generally enforces the use of local seed material based on the “local‐is‐best” (LIB) approach. However, in some cases recommendations to refrain from this approach have been made. Here we test if a common widespread species with no obvious signs of local adaptation may be a candidate species for abandoning LIB during restoration. Using 10 microsatellite markers we compared population genetic patterns of the generalist species Daucus carota in indigenous and formerly restored sites (nonlocal seed provenances). Gene diversity overall ranged between H
e = 0.67 and 0.86 and showed no significant differences between the two groups. Hierarchical AMOVA and principal component analysis revealed very high genetic population admixture and negligible differentiation between indigenous and restored sites (F
CT = 0.002). Moreover, differentiation between groups was caused by only one outlier population, where inbreeding effects are presumed. We therefore conclude that the introduction of nonlocal seed provenances in the course of landscape restoration did not jeopardize regional species persistence by contributing to inbreeding or outbreeding depressions, or any measurable adverse population genetic effect. On the basis of these results, we see no obvious objections to the current practice to use the 10‐fold cheaper, nonlocal seed material of D. carota for restoration projects.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.