2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-98361-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Loan default prediction of Chinese P2P market: a machine learning methodology

Abstract: Repayment failures of borrowers have greatly affected the sustainable development of the peer-to-peer (P2P) lending industry. The latest literature reveals that existing risk evaluation systems may ignore important signals and risk factors affecting P2P repayment. In our study, we applied four machine learning methods (random forest (RF), extreme gradient boosting tree (XGBT), gradient boosting model (GBM), and neural network (NN)) to predict important factors affecting repayment by utilizing data from Renrend… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Third, our study adds to the loan default prediction literature (Xu et al, 2021) by revealing the diagnostic value of different types of private information in predicting loan defaults. Specifically, we find that high-cost information is more effective in confirming borrowers who repay and do so on time, whereas low-cost information is more valuable in identifying loan defaults.…”
Section: Theoretical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Third, our study adds to the loan default prediction literature (Xu et al, 2021) by revealing the diagnostic value of different types of private information in predicting loan defaults. Specifically, we find that high-cost information is more effective in confirming borrowers who repay and do so on time, whereas low-cost information is more valuable in identifying loan defaults.…”
Section: Theoretical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…First, more information disclosure does not necessarily represent borrowers' quality in funding repayment. For example, certain information that borrowers provide is not verified onsite, which may be reflected in a higher probability of repayment failure (Xu et al, 2021). Second, borrowers with different credit ratings may exhibit distinct disclosure motivations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Xu et al used 4 machine learning methods (RF, XGBT, GBM, and NN) to predict factors affecting repayment of borrowers. They conclude that the RF performs well in the classification task of default [12]. Huang et al explain that SVM and NN achieve better prediction accuracy than traditional statistical methods in credit rating analyses for the US and Taiwan markets [13].…”
Section: August 2022mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hamori et al [ 22 ] used bagging, random forest, and boosting and compared with neural network models., Kim et al [ 27 ] used machine learning algorithms logistic regression, random forest, support vector machine and feedforward neural network models. [ 33 ]) used random forest, extreme gradient boosting tree, gradient boosting model, and neural network models. Thus we see that there are many variants of machine learning models applied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%