2017
DOI: 10.1145/3152042.3152071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Load-side Frequency Regulation with Limited Control Coverage

Abstract: Increasing renewable energy increases uncertainty in energy systems. As a consequence, generator-side control for frequency regulation, impacted by the slow reaction of generators to meet urgent needs, may no longer suffice. With increasing integration of smart appliances which are able to sense, communicate and control, load-side control can help alleviate the aforementioned problem as it reacts fast and helps to localize disturbances. However, almost all existing methods for optimal load-side control require… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The damping d is mainly due to the response of the local load to variations in frequency, which suggests that active load control is the best frequency regulation tool to mitigate step disturbances. Indeed, recent literature [28], [30], [37], [43], [44] has explored the potential of this method, also enabled by smarter grids. Our results lend support for this control strategy for improving synchronization in future power networks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The damping d is mainly due to the response of the local load to variations in frequency, which suggests that active load control is the best frequency regulation tool to mitigate step disturbances. Indeed, recent literature [28], [30], [37], [43], [44] has explored the potential of this method, also enabled by smarter grids. Our results lend support for this control strategy for improving synchronization in future power networks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The last statement follows from the KKT conditions of (12), in particular ν * = ω * = 0. Indeed, the planner's problem (12) suggests another way of defining clearing prices based on dual optimizes (λ * , η * , ν * ), given by λ * • 1 − Hη * − ν * , such that they are incentive compatible with the economic dispatch q * :…”
Section: A Planner's Problemmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This means of pricing essentially boils down to the canonical LMPs λ * • 1 − Hη * with ν * = 0. Central to our developments will be the Lagrangian for the convex planner's problem (12), i.e., L(p, q, ω, θ, α, λ, η, ν)…”
Section: A Planner's Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The increase in DERs would help the grid and its participants as well in terms of line management [6] and in terms of cost, where the locational marginal prices are less likely to increase since there is less congested power lines. Another possible benefit is the increased ability to perform frequency regulation [7] using the enhanced level of controllable load participation. Other benefits include more competitive prices, and improved economic efficiency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%