2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2021.130771
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Load-flexible fixed-bed reactors by multi-period design optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
11
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Fischer and Freund proposed staged reactor setups with different levels of catalyst dilution and feed dosing, showing a significant improvement of load flexibility and no limitations to dynamic behavior. Zimmermann et al compare catalyst dilution and core–shell particle as design strategy for flexible and dynamic operation. Optimal design and operating parameters are determined for both cases and the response to step changes is compared, which demonstrates that faster load changes can be realized with core–shell particles.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fischer and Freund proposed staged reactor setups with different levels of catalyst dilution and feed dosing, showing a significant improvement of load flexibility and no limitations to dynamic behavior. Zimmermann et al compare catalyst dilution and core–shell particle as design strategy for flexible and dynamic operation. Optimal design and operating parameters are determined for both cases and the response to step changes is compared, which demonstrates that faster load changes can be realized with core–shell particles.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[17,[19][20][21] Many studies have investigated the reactor behavior during the dynamic operation through reactor modeling and all of them have used global rate expressions such as the Langmuir-Hinshelwood-Hougen-Watson (LHHW) approach. [5,6,[22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] However, the parameters of these kinetics are always regressed to steady-state experiments. [31][32][33] Although these kinetic approaches are used frequently, they fail to accurately describe transient effects commonly observed in methanation experiments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies have investigated the reactor behavior during the dynamic operation through reactor modeling and all of them have used global rate expressions such as the Langmuir‐Hinshelwood‐Hougen‐Watson (LHHW) approach [5,6,22–30] . However, the parameters of these kinetics are always regressed to steady‐state experiments [31–33] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address this, Zimmermann et al . have recently investigated the use of non‐uniform catalyst particles [9,10] . It was found that core‐shell catalysts, i. e ., pellets consisting of a catalytically active core surrounded by an inactive shell, result in a faster start‐up and shut‐down of the reactor compared to uniform catalyst particles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address this, Zimmermann et al have recently investigated the use of non-uniform catalyst particles. [9,10] It was found that coreshell catalysts, i. e., pellets consisting of a catalytically active core surrounded by an inactive shell, result in a faster start-up and shut-down of the reactor compared to uniform catalyst particles. More importantly though, wrong-way behavior is avoided, and parametric sensitivity studies reveal broad operation regimes in terms of coolant temperature, reactor pressure and inlet gas velocity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%