Abstract:Autonomous vehicles need precise knowledge on dynamic objects in their surroundings. Especially in urban areas with many objects and possible occlusions, an infrastructure system based on a multi-sensor setup can provide the required environment model for the vehicles. Previously, we have published a concept of object reference points (e.g. the corners of an object), which allows for generic sensor "plug and play" interfaces and relatively cheap sensors. This paper describes a novel method to additionally inco… Show more
“…k = T . Then, using the PM-δ-GLMB filter, the total computational complexity for each source hypothesis yields O(V T log T + T V s=1 (M (s) + 2P ) 4 ), if the Murty algorithm is used, and O(V T log T + T P 2 V s=1 M (s) ), if a Gibbs sampler is used. This means that the complexity of the fusion (first summand) is negligible compared to the cost of the sensor updates (second summand) in both cases, resulting in the complexities O(T V s=1 (M (s) + 2P ) 4 ) (Murty) and O(T P 2 V s=1 M (s) ) (Gibbs).…”
Section: F Discussion Of the Computational Complexitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…due to sensor limitations, large environments or occlusions. One example is the field of Cooperative Intelligent Transportation Systems, where environment models from distributed infrastructure sensors [3], [4] can help automated vehicles [5] and human drivers [6], especially in complex urban scenarios [7].…”
Distributed scenarios pose a big challenge to tracking and fusion systems. They require the prevention of repeatedly incorporating the same information, which originates from ring closures in the communication path and would affect optimality. Additionally, the multi-sensor multi-object Generalized Labeled Multi-Bernoulli filter update is NP-hard in principle. The method proposed in this paper tackles these problems, as it constitutes a divide and conquer strategy for distributed, synchronized multi-sensor systems with central fusion. Based on a common prediction, local sensor updates are calculated separately, sent back and fused centrally in order to start a new cycle. Thus, the intractable multi-sensor update is split into less complex local single-sensor updates and a novel, low-complexity fusion strategy. The proposed method enables a full parallelization of the optimal multi-sensor Generalized Labeled Multi-Bernoulli and δ-Generalized Labeled Multi-Bernoulli update. Our approach bases on the Bayes Parallel Combination Rule and can be seen as multi-sensor multi-object Information Matrix Fusion for synchronous sensors, which constitutes a perfect choice in centralized systems with distributed sensors. Finally, we compare the proposed method to the Iterator Corrector approach from literature in detailed simulations.
“…k = T . Then, using the PM-δ-GLMB filter, the total computational complexity for each source hypothesis yields O(V T log T + T V s=1 (M (s) + 2P ) 4 ), if the Murty algorithm is used, and O(V T log T + T P 2 V s=1 M (s) ), if a Gibbs sampler is used. This means that the complexity of the fusion (first summand) is negligible compared to the cost of the sensor updates (second summand) in both cases, resulting in the complexities O(T V s=1 (M (s) + 2P ) 4 ) (Murty) and O(T P 2 V s=1 M (s) ) (Gibbs).…”
Section: F Discussion Of the Computational Complexitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…due to sensor limitations, large environments or occlusions. One example is the field of Cooperative Intelligent Transportation Systems, where environment models from distributed infrastructure sensors [3], [4] can help automated vehicles [5] and human drivers [6], especially in complex urban scenarios [7].…”
Distributed scenarios pose a big challenge to tracking and fusion systems. They require the prevention of repeatedly incorporating the same information, which originates from ring closures in the communication path and would affect optimality. Additionally, the multi-sensor multi-object Generalized Labeled Multi-Bernoulli filter update is NP-hard in principle. The method proposed in this paper tackles these problems, as it constitutes a divide and conquer strategy for distributed, synchronized multi-sensor systems with central fusion. Based on a common prediction, local sensor updates are calculated separately, sent back and fused centrally in order to start a new cycle. Thus, the intractable multi-sensor update is split into less complex local single-sensor updates and a novel, low-complexity fusion strategy. The proposed method enables a full parallelization of the optimal multi-sensor Generalized Labeled Multi-Bernoulli and δ-Generalized Labeled Multi-Bernoulli update. Our approach bases on the Bayes Parallel Combination Rule and can be seen as multi-sensor multi-object Information Matrix Fusion for synchronous sensors, which constitutes a perfect choice in centralized systems with distributed sensors. Finally, we compare the proposed method to the Iterator Corrector approach from literature in detailed simulations.
“…Further extensions and approximations to reduce the computational effort and to allow for a real-time application have been developed, like the Labeled Multi-Bernoulli (LMB) filter [40]. Our approach presented in this paper uses a centralized LMB Multi-Object Tracker (MOT) [18], [19]. However, the application would also allow for a distributed implementation of the Bayes-optimal GLMB filter between the MEC server and the sensor processing units (SPUs), as we show in [17].…”
The on-board sensors' view of an automated vehicle (AV) can suffer from occlusions by other traffic participants, buildings, or vegetation, especially in urban areas. However, knowledge of possible other traffic participants in the occluded areas is crucial for an energy and comfort optimizing control of an AV. In such a case, information from infrastructure sensors sent via vehicle to anything (V2X) communication can help the AV. Fur such cases, we have developed and prototypically implemented a concept where an infrastructure environment model is generated from infrastructure sensors on a multi-access edge computing (MEC) server of an LTE/5G mobile network. This information extends the AVs' field of view and is beneficially integrated into their motion planning schemes. In this article, after a description of the modules of our approach, we present and discuss real-world results from our pilot site on a public junction with prototype AVs.
“…Moratuwage, D. et al [ 31 ] presented a SLAM solution using an efficient variant of the δ-GLMB filter (δ-GLMB-SLAM) based on Gibbs sampling, which is computationally comparable to LMB-SLAM, yet more accurate and robust against sensor noise, measurement clutter, and feature detection uncertainty. Herrmann, M. et al [ 32 ] described a novel method to additionally incorporate multiple hypotheses for fusing the measurements of the object reference points using an extension to the previously presented Labeled Multi-Bernoulli (LMB) filter.…”
In recent years, various algorithms using random finite sets (RFS) to solve the issue of simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) have been proposed. Compared with the traditional method, the advantage of the RFS method is that it can avoid data association, landmark appearance and disappearance, missed detections, and false alarms in Bayesian recursion. There are many problems in the existing robot SLAM methods, such as low estimation accuracy, poor back-end optimization, etc. On the basis of previous studies, this paper presents a labeled random finite set (L-RFS) SLAM method. We describe a scene where the sensor moves along a given path and avoids obstacles based on the L-RFS framework. Then, we use the labeled multi-Bernoulli filter (LMB) to estimate the state of the sensor and feature points. At the same time, the B-spline curve is used to smooth the obstacle avoidance path of the sensor. The effectiveness of the algorithm is verified in the final simulation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.