2017
DOI: 10.1109/tbc.2016.2617280
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

LLR Reliability Improvement for Multilayer Signals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It was observed that at high SNR regions, the I-curves for the top-layer signal are reduced compared to QPSK + QPSK signal. This behavior refuses the conclusion extracted from [71]. The obtained results are not provided in this section, but performance results are presented and discussed in Section 2.4.…”
Section: I-curvessupporting
confidence: 72%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It was observed that at high SNR regions, the I-curves for the top-layer signal are reduced compared to QPSK + QPSK signal. This behavior refuses the conclusion extracted from [71]. The obtained results are not provided in this section, but performance results are presented and discussed in Section 2.4.…”
Section: I-curvessupporting
confidence: 72%
“…However, they are usually operational points to be avoided in service deployments. In [71], the impact of the x b constellation onto x t performance was only observed at practical regions for LDM operation, so that the system was only AWGN limited. The OD gains with respect to GD when either a QPSK or a 64NUC is used for the x b are summarized in Table 2…”
Section: Performance Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hence, potential performance gains may be achieved if this effect is considered. This paper expands the initial studies in [6] of a demapping approach for LDM systems in which the AWGN-like interference assumption may not be valid. This new demapping approach considers the distribution of the symbols of the underlying LDM layer when demapping the top-layer signal, which brings a potential gain under certain circumstances at the expense of additional complexity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…This new demapping approach considers the distribution of the symbols of the underlying LDM layer when demapping the top-layer signal, which brings a potential gain under certain circumstances at the expense of additional complexity. In addition to [6], the paper evaluates the new demapping concept from a generic point of view, via information theory, and studies the complexity of its implementation at receivers. Furthermore, a new algorithm is proposed, which forwards the a-priori information obtained by the demapping of the top-layer signal to the lowerlayer signal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%