1997
DOI: 10.1023/a:1007987316940
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Microgrippers are small micro/millimeter‐sized robotic devices that can grasp micro‐objects in a narrow and confined environment with accuracy that may not be achieved using manual operations. [ 1 ] Further, the controllability and adaptivity of the untethered designs of this device facilitated them as a promising tool for several applications such as particle manipulation [ 2–4 ] and micro‐assembly. [ 5–7 ] Meanwhile, a strong emphasis has been provided on understanding different aspects of the microgrippers, including the design, [ 8 ] fabrication, [ 9 ] and assembly [ 10 ] that can ease the overall challenges, such as complex structures, amplified stiffness, slow response time, and limited manipulations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microgrippers are small micro/millimeter‐sized robotic devices that can grasp micro‐objects in a narrow and confined environment with accuracy that may not be achieved using manual operations. [ 1 ] Further, the controllability and adaptivity of the untethered designs of this device facilitated them as a promising tool for several applications such as particle manipulation [ 2–4 ] and micro‐assembly. [ 5–7 ] Meanwhile, a strong emphasis has been provided on understanding different aspects of the microgrippers, including the design, [ 8 ] fabrication, [ 9 ] and assembly [ 10 ] that can ease the overall challenges, such as complex structures, amplified stiffness, slow response time, and limited manipulations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As objects scale down in size, viscous forces start to become dominant, and the amount of power required to propel the system will increase [6,7]. For example, [8] describes several microrobots that use various piezoelectric-based actuator assemblies for motion. The authors discuss how their original design required 300 V to actuate the piezoelectric actuators, while a more recent design allowed them to reduce the required input to 60 V. Depending on the size of the microrobot electromagnetic [9,10] and pneumatic micromotors [11] may also be an option for driving wheels, tracks or propellers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…for robotic systems include direct wiring, batteries and solar power. The main disadvantage of direct wiring is that it limits the operating range of the microrobot, and may also hinder its motion [8]. The most apparent way to overcome this issue is through the use of on-board power storage, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%