Living in Latvia after stroke: the association between functional, social and personal factors and the level of self-perceived disability—a cross-sectional study

Abstract

ObjectiveTo investigate how functional, social and personal factors are associated with self-perceived level of disability in the chronic phase of stroke in a Latvian stroke population. The consequences of stroke can vary greatly and often leads to long-term disability that, according to the WHO definitions, depends on the interaction between the person and his/her context.DesignCross-sectional study with retrospective data gathering.SettingCommunity-dwelling persons who received specialised in-patient rehabilitation after stroke in Latvia.ParticipantsOf 600 persons after stroke who were identified through hospital register and selected for the study, 255 were included in the analysis.Primary and secondary outcome measuresThe medical information and discharge data of the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) was extracted from medical records. Participants filled out a questionnaire on sociodemographic information and the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0), either in Latvian or Russian, depending on their wish when contacted for their oral agreement to participate. Stepwise multiple regression analysis was conducted to find a model that best explains the variance in WHODAS 2.0 scores.ResultsThe models explained 23–43.5% of variance in outcomes. The best explained WHODAS 2.0 domains were ‘mobility’ and ‘self-care’. The significant factors were level of independence in ‘self-care’, ‘locomotion’ and ‘communication’ according to FIM, as well as working status, time since rehabilitation, age, gender, living alone or in family and preferred language.ConclusionsFunctional, social and personal factors are of similar importance when explaining self-perceived disability in the chronic phase of stroke. Some, but not all, of the factors are modifiable by the healthcare system. Therefore, a complex approach and involvement of medical, social and political systems is needed.

Perceptions of self-rated health among stroke survivors: a qualitative study in the United Kingdom

“…While the relationship between physical functioning, disability and self-perceptions of health among stroke survivors is complex and strongly mediated by context and individual factors [ 52 ], their impact on disability may be diminished and experiences of health enhanced by assessing self-perceptions in individual patients and tailoring rehabilitation accordingly. A simple question of ‘how would you rate your health?’ followed by a range of options ‘(for example, poor, fair, good or excellent), can give a wealth of information to the healthcare professional, and aid in the targeting of interventions.…”

Stroke-Specific Quality of Life one-year post-stroke in two Scandinavian country-regions with different organisation of rehabilitation services: a prospective study

“…Stroke is a common cause of disability [1], which may affect functioning in any aspect of a persons' life [2,3]. Multiple functional impairments following stroke may occur separately or combined, including motor functioning, cognition, perception, visual functioning, emotional and mental health, and language problems [4,5].…”

Health-related Quality of Life Using WHODAS 2.0 and Associated Factors 1 Year After Stroke in Korea: a Multi-center and Cross-sectional Study

“…This indicates PSO is not only about getting along with people either not only doing daily life. A prior study considers PSO as most problematic and important because this domain has involved the usage of complex skills and navigation in daily life [20].…”