2011
DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.2011.186
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Liver Transplantation for the Treatment of Liver Metastases From Neuroendocrine Tumors

Abstract: To determine outcomes in patients undergoing liver transplantation (LT) for metastatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
125
1
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 172 publications
(130 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
125
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to liver secondaries of adenocarcinomas, nonresectable neuroendocrine LM are an indication for LT under consideration of strict evaluation process (Lerut et al 2007, Bonaccorsi-Riani et al 2010, Gedaly et al 2011. While nonresectable extrahepatic tumor manifestation, Ki-67% O15%, and severe carcinoid heart disease are generally accepted as exclusion criteria for LT, patient age (!50 vs O50 years), the dynamics of the hepatic tumor growth (stable disease vs rapid tumor progress), the extent of hepatic involvement, and timing of transplantation (first-line treatment vs an ultima ratio approach after unsuccessful previous treatment) remain controversial (Olausson et al 2002, Rosenau et al 2002, Le Treut et al 2008.…”
Section: R170mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to liver secondaries of adenocarcinomas, nonresectable neuroendocrine LM are an indication for LT under consideration of strict evaluation process (Lerut et al 2007, Bonaccorsi-Riani et al 2010, Gedaly et al 2011. While nonresectable extrahepatic tumor manifestation, Ki-67% O15%, and severe carcinoid heart disease are generally accepted as exclusion criteria for LT, patient age (!50 vs O50 years), the dynamics of the hepatic tumor growth (stable disease vs rapid tumor progress), the extent of hepatic involvement, and timing of transplantation (first-line treatment vs an ultima ratio approach after unsuccessful previous treatment) remain controversial (Olausson et al 2002, Rosenau et al 2002, Le Treut et al 2008.…”
Section: R170mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other antitumor options, mainly transarterial liver chemoembolization, are frequently used with the expectation of combining antitumor and antisecretory early responses (5). Finally, beneficial effects with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy have been demonstrated in some patients with malignant insulinomas (37) as well as surgery including liver transplantation in anecdotal cases (5,31,37,38). Although sunitinib has recently been approved in progressive advanced pNET, the decline in blood glucose reported with this agent makes its use in malignant insulinoma questionable (37,39).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, recent clinical trials by the Mayo Clinic evaluating a multimodality treatment concept for CCA combining neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy and liver transplantation have established CCA as an indication for liver transplantation in selected patients with unresectable hilar CCA or CCA arising in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (Rosen et al 2010;Darwish Murad et al 2012). Clinical trials evaluating liver transplantation for selected patients with neuroendocrine hepatic metastases have shown long-term graft and patient survival comparable with patients transplanted for HCC (Gedaly et al 2011). In individual cases, patients with neuroendocrine liver metastases thus are eligible for liver transplantation.…”
Section: Indications For Liver Transplantationmentioning
confidence: 99%