2018
DOI: 10.1093/jas/sky029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Liver transcriptomic and plasma metabolomic profiles of fattening lambs are modified by feed restriction during the suckling period1

Abstract: The increasing world population is driving demand for improved efficiency of feed resources of livestock. However, the molecular mechanisms behind various feed efficiency traits and their regulation by nutrition remain poorly understood. Here, we aimed to identify differentially expressed (DE) genes in the liver tissues of fattening Merino lambs and differences in metabolites accumulated in plasma to identify modified metabolic pathways as a consequence of milk restriction during the suckling period. Twenty-fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(44 reference statements)
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Each lamb was weaned progressively starting at 13.5 kg body weight (BW). Weaned lambs weighing 15 kg of BW were penned individually, had free access to fresh drinking water, and were offered the same complete pelleted diet (CPD) at 35 g/kg BW per day throughout the fattening period to avoid differences in dry matter intake as explained elsewhere [ 10 , 12 , 13 ]. All the lambs received the CPD as a single daily meal at 09:00 h, and the amount of feed offered was adjusted twice a week based on the BW.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each lamb was weaned progressively starting at 13.5 kg body weight (BW). Weaned lambs weighing 15 kg of BW were penned individually, had free access to fresh drinking water, and were offered the same complete pelleted diet (CPD) at 35 g/kg BW per day throughout the fattening period to avoid differences in dry matter intake as explained elsewhere [ 10 , 12 , 13 ]. All the lambs received the CPD as a single daily meal at 09:00 h, and the amount of feed offered was adjusted twice a week based on the BW.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of these factors might be related to early feed restriction of animals (Greenwood and Cafe, 2007) during the postnatal phases, when the colonization of mucosal epithelium of the gastrointestinal tract by commensal bacteria takes place (Taschuk and Griebel, 2012). Interestingly, once established the epimural microbiota seems to be less influenced by the diet than microbiota associated to digesta contents (Petri et al, 2013;Yáñez-Ruiz et al, 2015), so any factor (e.g., early feed restriction) modifying the composition of the microbiota firmly attached to these cells may modulate not only the nutrient processing (Santos et al, 2018a and2018b) but also the gut-associated lymphoid tissue, thus exerting nutritional programming of immune health and hence long-term effects on lifetime feed efficiency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Introduction Early feed restriction during the suckling period may impact feed efficiency traits during post-weaning phases (Santos et al, 2018). In this sense, differential gene expression between individuals is a key source of variation that can be used to identify candidate genes and pathways involved in metabolic programming (Ruchat et al, 2014).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%