2006
DOI: 10.1097/01.tp.0000228239.78290.13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Liver Repopulation by Transplanted Hepatocytes and Risk of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Abstract: These results indicate that liver repopulation in this model is largely stable, persisting for up to two years and allowing for a normal liver function. In addition, no increased risk of neoplastic transformation appears to be associated with the process of liver repopulation for as long as over two thirds of the life span of the recipient animal.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To test this possibility, the origin of such a putative common precursor cell compartment was analyzed in the repopulated liver. We first confirmed and extended our earlier observation concerning the stability of the donor hepatocyte phenotype in the RS-exposed and repopulated liver (Laconi et al 2006). As shown in Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To test this possibility, the origin of such a putative common precursor cell compartment was analyzed in the repopulated liver. We first confirmed and extended our earlier observation concerning the stability of the donor hepatocyte phenotype in the RS-exposed and repopulated liver (Laconi et al 2006). As shown in Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In rats exposed to retrorsine (RS) and then injected with normal syngeneic hepatocytes, near-total replacement of the resident parenchyma by donor-derived cells is observed (Laconi et al 2001). Notably, liver repopulation in this system is stable, persisting for at least 2 years after cell transplantation (Laconi et al 2006). The latter observation is important, because it implies that any rate of hepatocyte turnover in these animals must be sustained by cells of donor origin, irrespective of their specific phenotype.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While any direct involvement of the immune system was not investigated in our present study, our findings appear difficult to reconcile with the above proposition. In fact, there is no evidence that RS-induced senescent hepatocytes display any direct pre-neoplastic potential [41]; on the other hand, they are able to support the growth of transplanted nodular hepatocytes and their progression to HCC [8]. Thus, it appears that, under the conditions described in our studies, the role of cell senescence is to promote the growth of carcinogen-induced altered cells, possibly through the effect(s) of SASP/SMS components, including IL-6 [42].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…80 As a corollary to these findings, it is important to note that experimental liver repopulation per se does not result in any increased risk of donor cell-derived neoplastic disease. 22,81 In summary, the analysis of available models for liver repopulation provides compelling evidence to indicate that any cytotoxic microenvironment (the same coin) sustaining the selective growth of normal transplanted hepatocytes (side one) can also select for the emergence of rare resistant cells with an altered phenotype (the other side of the coin). This establishes a close mechanistic link between liver repopulation on one hand and early phases of cancer development on the other.…”
Section: Significance and Future Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%