2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-013-2826-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Liver fat volume fraction quantification with fat and water T1 and T2* estimation and accounting for NMR multiple components in patients with chronic liver disease at 1.5 and 3.0 T

Abstract: • Non-invasive techniques to diagnose non-alcoholic fatty liver diseases (NAFLD) are important. • Liver fat volume fraction quantified using MRI correlates well with histology. • Fat volume fraction could be a relevant marker for NAFLD clinical follow-up. • Disjointed relaxation time estimation could potentially identify factors contributing to NAFLD.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
31
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lipid T 1 we found is higher than previously reported by Leporq et al However, our result agrees well with the subcutaneous fat T 1 (382 ± 13 msec) value . Liver water T 1 were published by Leporq et al and de Bazelaire et al (Table ). Fundamentally different MRI water‐fat signal separation methods and T 1 quantification approaches could explain the lower fat and water T 1 values compared to our results.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The lipid T 1 we found is higher than previously reported by Leporq et al However, our result agrees well with the subcutaneous fat T 1 (382 ± 13 msec) value . Liver water T 1 were published by Leporq et al and de Bazelaire et al (Table ). Fundamentally different MRI water‐fat signal separation methods and T 1 quantification approaches could explain the lower fat and water T 1 values compared to our results.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…At 7T, relaxation times T 1 (1084 ± 52 msec) and T 2 (32 ± 9 msec) of healthy human liver were estimated by Gajdosik et al Our results are in line with these two measurements, taking into account the fact that increased field strength leads to increased T 1 and to a minor decrease in T 2 . Just one 3T study was dedicated to quantify T 1 of the liver lipid (CH 2 ) n , and two works evaluated water T 1 , in spite of strong signals of both components (Table ). The lipid T 1 we found is higher than previously reported by Leporq et al However, our result agrees well with the subcutaneous fat T 1 (382 ± 13 msec) value .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liver fat fraction and T 2 *, reflecting iron content, can be calculated with chemical shift‐encoded gradient‐echo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) . Nevertheless, these methods alone cannot assess fibrosis and inflammation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is the T 1 of the water component which appears to be of diagnostic significance when using T 1 mapping in the liver,14 while the T 1 of the fat is constant15 and not a predictor of disease. An important step towards the use of MOLLI T 1 to assess liver disease is the clarification and quantification of the extent to which the presence of fat can mask or exaggerate changes in MOLLI T 1 due to disease.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%