2010
DOI: 10.1038/nmeth0111-7b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Live-cell dSTORM with SNAP-tag fusion proteins

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
186
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 227 publications
(189 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
186
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In a recent publication, Klein et al demonstrated the use of SNAP-tag based H2B labeling with a rhodamine type fluorophore showing switching behavior in live cells similar to ATTO655. They successfully validated the capability of rhodamines for SR-imaging in live cell dSTORM experiments [93]. …”
Section: Chemical Tags For Super-resolution Imaging In Live Cellsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In a recent publication, Klein et al demonstrated the use of SNAP-tag based H2B labeling with a rhodamine type fluorophore showing switching behavior in live cells similar to ATTO655. They successfully validated the capability of rhodamines for SR-imaging in live cell dSTORM experiments [93]. …”
Section: Chemical Tags For Super-resolution Imaging In Live Cellsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…However, these methods rely on antibodies coupled to organic dyes (4,8) or on fusions with fluorescent or fluorophore-binding proteins (3,7,(9)(10)(11) and have restrictions inherent to these labeling strategies. Antibodies suffer from variable specificity depending on fixation conditions and from limited commercial availability.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are prominent differences that result from the use of photoconvertible fluorescent proteins or synthetic organic fluorophores: PA-FPs have maximal labelling efficiency and specificity, and they are smaller (the barrel in which the FP chromophore sits is 2.4×4.2 nm [123], while the size of an IgG antibody is ≈7-8 nm); on the contrary, synthetic fluorophores show higher photostability and brightness than PA-FPs, which results in higher localisation precision, and their photoswitching rates can be controlled by external means, which allows faster acquisitions. Both types of fluorophores may be used for imaging living cells; in the case of synthetic fluorophores, appropriate labelling systems and reducing conditions are required [124,125].…”
Section: Fluorescent Probes For Localisation Microscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to live-cell STED, live-cell STORM also requires the use of genetically encoded polypeptide tags: trimethoprim conjugates [124], HaloTag [151], SNAP-Tag [125] or tagging with small tetracysteine motifs and the fluorescein arsenical helix binder FlAsH [152,153]. Photoswitchable proteins and genetically encoded tags can be expressed simultaneously in the same cell: A recent combination of HaloTag labelling (Atto655) and expression of PATagRFP and PA-GFP has allowed triple colour STORM/PALM imaging in living cells [154].…”
Section: Fluorescent Probes For Localisation Microscopymentioning
confidence: 99%