2018
DOI: 10.1111/nph.15308
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Little evidence that farmers should consider abundance or diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi when managing crops

Abstract: Contents Summary 1092 I. Introduction 1093 II. Investigating activity of AMF in agroecosystems 1093 III. Crop benefit from AMF: agronomic and mycorrhizal literature differ 1094 IV. Flawed methodology leads to benefits of mycorrhizas being overstated 1094 V. Rigorous methodology suggests low colonisation by AMF can sometimes reduce crop yield 1095 VI. Predicting when mycorrhizas matter for crop yield 1096 VII. Crop genotype 1099 VIII. Fungal genotype 1100 IX. Complex interactions between the mycorrhizal fungal … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
175
1
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 222 publications
(182 citation statements)
references
References 142 publications
(255 reference statements)
2
175
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…() note other potential benefits, including biofortification, improved soil aggregation and reduced nutrient leaching. We contend that the literature pertaining to these processes expresses similar undue optimism as described for yield by Ryan & Graham () because of a paucity of field‐relevant experimentation, experimental rigour (in some instances) and agricultural systems context. In this Letter, we concentrate on the last issue, as Ryan & Graham () provide specific examples of the first two.…”
Section: A Response To Rillig Et Al (2019) ‘Why Farmers Should Managmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…() note other potential benefits, including biofortification, improved soil aggregation and reduced nutrient leaching. We contend that the literature pertaining to these processes expresses similar undue optimism as described for yield by Ryan & Graham () because of a paucity of field‐relevant experimentation, experimental rigour (in some instances) and agricultural systems context. In this Letter, we concentrate on the last issue, as Ryan & Graham () provide specific examples of the first two.…”
Section: A Response To Rillig Et Al (2019) ‘Why Farmers Should Managmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…We welcome the comments of Rillig et al . () on Ryan & Graham (). A robust debate concerning the need to manage arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) in agricultural systems has been long overdue.…”
Section: A Response To Rillig Et Al (2019) ‘Why Farmers Should Managmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The scientific rewards from comprehensive research programs on mycorrhizal symbioses include a greater fundamental understanding of the interactions between organisms at the community level and benefits for sustainable agriculture and forestry. A deeper understanding of the complex array of factors affecting host–fungus interactions and co‐evolution could indeed ensure efficient selection of fungal symbionts for large‐scale inoculation methods in forest and agricultural ecosystems, although all scientists are not so optimistic (Ryan & Graham, , pp. 1092–1107).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An area where consistent and easy‐to‐communicate naming is required is the application of AM fungi. Ryan & Graham (; in this issue of New Phytologist , pp. 1092–1107) provoke the research community to take a fresh look on what is known about functional roles of AM fungi in agroecosystems and what would the crop growers need from scientists to be able to harness the potential of soil biodiversity for more environment‐friendly and sustainable crop production, but also for minimizing destruction of natural habitats.…”
Section: Mycorrhizal Fungal Community Ecologymentioning
confidence: 99%