2016
DOI: 10.1111/gcb.13502
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Litter decay controlled by temperature, not soil properties, affecting future soil carbon

Abstract: Widespread global changes, including rising atmospheric CO 2 concentrations, climate warming and loss of biodiversity, are predicted for this century; all of these will affect terrestrial ecosystem processes like plant litter decomposition. Conversely, increased plant litter decomposition can have potential carbon-cycle feedbacks on atmospheric CO 2 levels, climate warming and biodiversity. But predicting litter decomposition is difficult because of many interacting factors related to the chemical, physical an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

5
32
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
(78 reference statements)
5
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, mean annual temperature (MAT) and mean annual precipitation (MAP) explained 38% of the variance in litter decomposition for 11 litter species at different forest sites across Canada (Moore et al, 1999). Additionally, Gregorich et al (2016) reported that the time required for litter decomposition decreased by 1 and 2 years in the cool zone and warm zone, respectively. This relationship between climate and litter has been incorporated into ecosystem C cycle and terrestrial ecological models, and the litter turnover times of different litter tissues (leaves, stems and roots) are usually simulated using soil moisture and air temperature.…”
Section: Highlightsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, mean annual temperature (MAT) and mean annual precipitation (MAP) explained 38% of the variance in litter decomposition for 11 litter species at different forest sites across Canada (Moore et al, 1999). Additionally, Gregorich et al (2016) reported that the time required for litter decomposition decreased by 1 and 2 years in the cool zone and warm zone, respectively. This relationship between climate and litter has been incorporated into ecosystem C cycle and terrestrial ecological models, and the litter turnover times of different litter tissues (leaves, stems and roots) are usually simulated using soil moisture and air temperature.…”
Section: Highlightsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Frøseth and Bleken (2015) reported that litter turnover time was higher in sandy compared to clay soil. Gregorich et al (2016) concluded that soil properties, such as soil nutrients, had little influence on litter turnover compared with soil moisture and temperature. It is clear that complex interconnections exist among these factors.…”
Section: Highlightsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The decomposition of plant residue and soil organic matter (SOM) is important because of its feedback to the concentration of atmospheric greenhouse gas. Temperature is one of the main controllers of decomposition (Curiel Yuste et al, 2007;Gregorich et al, 2016) and is expected to change and become more variable in the future (Hansen et al, 2006). Prediction of the response of SOM decomposition to temperature is difficult because of the influences of many interwoven and fluctuating factors; these include the availability and concentration of substrates (Davidson & Janssens, 2006;German et al, 2011), the quality or complexity of the organic matter (substrate) (Giardina & Ryan, 2000;Schmidt et al, 2011), and the activity and composition of the microbial community (Strickland et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The litter is a terrestrial ecosystem that is fundamental for nutrients cycling and supply carbon to the soils (Gregorich et al, 2016). Studies have demonstrated that its removal, which mostly occurs by land-use changes and burning, causes negative impacts on the soil quality properties, like soil bulk density, soil organic matter and microbiological diversity (Tanner;Sheldrake;Turner, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%