2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.08.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Litter and soil-related variation in functional group abundances in cacao agroforests using structural equation modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0
4

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
13
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The co-inertia analysis showed significant covariance (RV: 0.33, p-value: 0.002, Monte Carlo test) between soil macrofauna and edaphic properties (Figure 3). These results coincide with previous studies describing the different relationships between soil macrofauna groups and soil properties (Lima et al, 2010;Vasconcellos et al, 2013;Oliveira et al, 2018). Figure 2.…”
Section: /8supporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The co-inertia analysis showed significant covariance (RV: 0.33, p-value: 0.002, Monte Carlo test) between soil macrofauna and edaphic properties (Figure 3). These results coincide with previous studies describing the different relationships between soil macrofauna groups and soil properties (Lima et al, 2010;Vasconcellos et al, 2013;Oliveira et al, 2018). Figure 2.…”
Section: /8supporting
confidence: 92%
“…Soil macrofauna constitutes an important component of soil biota given the significant impact of their activities in ecosystem functions (Kamau et al, 2017), besides being part of different trophic levels, presents interactions with the edaphic properties (Lavelle et al, 2006). There are physical and chemical soil properties that interact with soil macrofauna groups by influencing their metabolism, while at the same time responding to the behavior of soil macrofauna (Santos et al, 2018;Oliveira et al, 2018). The most cited physical properties are soil texture, soil density and porosity, which are associated with soil structure (Rousseau et al, 2012), while the chemical properties are associated to organic matter content, soil fertility and nutrient availability (Lima et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The remaining eight land uses concentrated in the third cluster, which included pasture (PA), NR, and the other agroforestry systems. It has been proven that the age of the system (Camara et al, 2018), variations in the microclimate caused by absence of a compact canopy (Kamau et al, 2017), the quantity and quality of litter (Oliveira et al, 2018), agricultural practices (Marichal et al, 2014), the use of herbicides (Scoriza et al, 2015), and animal trampling (Morales -Márquez et al, 2018) influence the soil macrofauna. Therefore, we suggest that the unfavorable presence of any of these factors, or Pesq.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this scenario, agroforestry systems are land uses that can exhibit great similarities to natural forests due to their forest cover and litter (Baretta et al, 2011;Oliveira et al, 2018). Practices associated with agroforestry systems such as the inclusion of vegetation that is structurally and taxonomically diverse, as well as the presence of a continuous soil cover, seem to be associated with the abundance and diversity of soil macrofauna (Moço et al, 2010;Pauli et al, 2011;Kamau et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A macrofauna do solo constitui importante componente da biota edáfica, dado o impacto significativo de suas atividades nas funções do ecossistema (Kamau et al 2017). Esta, opor sua vez possui estreita relação com as propriedades físico-químicas do solo, sendo influenciada pela densidade, porosidade, textura, matéria orgânica, fertilidade e disponibilidade de nutrientes do solo, ao mesmo tempo que seu comportamento influencia na dinâmica edáfica (Rousseau et al 2014;Oliveira et al 2018;Santos et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified