2018
DOI: 10.15439/2018f22
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lithuanian Author Profiling with the Deep Learning

Abstract: We address the Lithuanian author profiling task in two dimensions (AGE and GENDER) using two deep learning methods (i.e., Long Short-Term Memory-LSTM) and Convolutional Neural Network-CNN) applied on the top of Lithuanian neural word embeddings. We also investigate an impact of the training dataset size on the author profiling accuracy. The best results are achieved with the largest datasets, containing 5,000 instances in each class. Besides, LSTM was more effective on the smaller datasets, and CNN-on the larg… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(25 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors of [26] solved the problem aimed to determine the gender and age of the authors of Lithuanian texts. LSTM and CNN applied on the top of Lithuanian neural word embeddings were used.…”
Section: Related Work On Classical Machine Learning Methods and Deep Neural Network For Authorship Attributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors of [26] solved the problem aimed to determine the gender and age of the authors of Lithuanian texts. LSTM and CNN applied on the top of Lithuanian neural word embeddings were used.…”
Section: Related Work On Classical Machine Learning Methods and Deep Neural Network For Authorship Attributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, DL methods have been used. For example, in Kapociute-Dzikiene and Damasevicius, 26 the authors used two DL methods for solving the gender and age identification problem for Lithuanian neural word embeddings. "LSTM" corresponds to the first method and "CNN" to the second one.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When examining closely the concerns of each age group, we find out that young people (13-17 years) speak more about sport, friendship, and the Internet. Unlike teenagers, middle-aged (23)(24)(25)(26)(27) discuss more issues related to money and shopping. Finally, the elderly people (33-47) speak more about medicine and family.…”
Section: Improving Age Prediction Using Svmmentioning
confidence: 99%