2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2008.06.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Litho- and biofacies analysis of postglacial marine mud using CT-Scanning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pictures of longitudinal sections were obtained in dicom format to be later analyzed by image J ® software. We analyzed the sedimentary structure of each core by using a tomogram representing tomographic intensities (TI) expressed in Hounsfield units (HU) along a longitudinal plane for the entire length of the core (Gagnoud et al 2009;Michaud et al 2003). The calibration gave specific values for tomographic intensities according to analyzed materials (i.e., TI air = -1000; TI water = 0; TI calcite = 2500).…”
Section: Data Processingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pictures of longitudinal sections were obtained in dicom format to be later analyzed by image J ® software. We analyzed the sedimentary structure of each core by using a tomogram representing tomographic intensities (TI) expressed in Hounsfield units (HU) along a longitudinal plane for the entire length of the core (Gagnoud et al 2009;Michaud et al 2003). The calibration gave specific values for tomographic intensities according to analyzed materials (i.e., TI air = -1000; TI water = 0; TI calcite = 2500).…”
Section: Data Processingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, medical computed tomography (CT) scanners have become common in the nondestructive analysis of sediment cores [St-Onge et al, 2007], including high-resolution reconstructions of relative or calibrated density for paleoenvironmental interpretation [Boespflug et al, 1995;Ashi, 1997;Lis e-Pronovost et al, 2009;St-Onge and Long, 2009;Støren et al, 2010;Davies et al, 2011;Dorfman et al, 2015], assessment of coring deformation [Ashi, 1997;Barletta et al, 2010;Walczak et al, 2017], and variations in sedimentological structures or components [Michaud et al, 2003;Gagnoud et al, 2009;Goldfinger et al, 2013;Mena et al, 2015;Patton et al, 2015]. Medical CT scanners measure the attenuation of X-rays, a function of density and atomic number, and store these values in pixels as relative gray scale values or Hounsfield units (HU), achieving resolution around 0.5 3 0.5 3 0.5 mm [Hounsfield, 1973].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grain size was more variable within the Paspébiac cores, and St-Siméon cores contained a greater proportion of mud and a higher organic matter content, suggesting that low energy conditions, vegetation and riverine input enhance sedimentation of finer particles at St-Siméon (Renaud, 2000). Site-specific differences in corer penetration (and resulting core length) were likely due to the relative position of a layer of dense, postglacial marine mud (Gagnoud et al , 2009), reflecting differences in the intensity and frequency of accretionary and erosionary (storm or ice-related) events in these intertidal areas. Dense postglacial mud limits the penetration of organisms of the Macoma balthica community such as Alitta virens (Gagnoud et al , 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Site-specific differences in corer penetration (and resulting core length) were likely due to the relative position of a layer of dense, postglacial marine mud (Gagnoud et al , 2009), reflecting differences in the intensity and frequency of accretionary and erosionary (storm or ice-related) events in these intertidal areas. Dense postglacial mud limits the penetration of organisms of the Macoma balthica community such as Alitta virens (Gagnoud et al , 2009). It appears, therefore, that the relative thickness of habitable space in the upper sediment was greater at the Paspébiac site.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%