2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11581-018-2768-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lithium titanate nanotubes as active fillers for lithium-ion polyacrylonitrile solid polymer electrolytes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The increment of conducting polymer electronic charge carriers near the interphase could be discussed in view of at least two eventual scenarios: (one or passive ) the dopant stabilizes at the interphase due to strong polar or coulombic interactions with nanoparticles surface, or/and (two or active ) the nanoparticles are also good electronic acceptors, producing in both cases an enhancement on the doping of nearby polymer chains, as schematized in Figure 1C (upper panel). On the other hand, micro-Raman imaging has also been useful to evidence the enhancement of ionic-pair dissociation occurring near the interphase with inorganic nanoparticles, in agreement with the increment of ionic conductivity (Romero et al, 2016 ; Pignanelli et al, 2018 , Pignanelli et al, 2019a ). Analogously, two different scenarios could be discussed for ionic charge carriers: (one or passive ) the counter-ion (in analogy to the dopant anion) stabilizes at the interphase due to strong polar or coulombic interactions with nanoparticles surface yielding an enhancement on the ionic-pair dissociation, or/and (two or active ) the nanoparticles may also possess mobile ionic carriers at the surface (e.g., active filler) that can be injected into the polymer, as schematized in Figure 1C (lower panel).…”
Section: Charge Carrier Localizationmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The increment of conducting polymer electronic charge carriers near the interphase could be discussed in view of at least two eventual scenarios: (one or passive ) the dopant stabilizes at the interphase due to strong polar or coulombic interactions with nanoparticles surface, or/and (two or active ) the nanoparticles are also good electronic acceptors, producing in both cases an enhancement on the doping of nearby polymer chains, as schematized in Figure 1C (upper panel). On the other hand, micro-Raman imaging has also been useful to evidence the enhancement of ionic-pair dissociation occurring near the interphase with inorganic nanoparticles, in agreement with the increment of ionic conductivity (Romero et al, 2016 ; Pignanelli et al, 2018 , Pignanelli et al, 2019a ). Analogously, two different scenarios could be discussed for ionic charge carriers: (one or passive ) the counter-ion (in analogy to the dopant anion) stabilizes at the interphase due to strong polar or coulombic interactions with nanoparticles surface yielding an enhancement on the ionic-pair dissociation, or/and (two or active ) the nanoparticles may also possess mobile ionic carriers at the surface (e.g., active filler) that can be injected into the polymer, as schematized in Figure 1C (lower panel).…”
Section: Charge Carrier Localizationmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…An example on the use of Raman imaging to monitor the state of charge for a Li 1−x (Ni y Co z Al 1−y−z )O 2 cathode is shown and described briefly in Figure 1B (Nanda et al, 2011 ). In addition, the use of micro-Raman imaging technique is highly powerful to study simultaneously both compositional and microstructural features, especially for hybrid inorganic–organic materials, as the characteristic Raman signals for inorganic and organic compounds generally lie well-separated at lower (ν < 800 cm −1 ) and higher (ν > 800 cm −1 ) wavenumbers, respectively (Romero et al, 2016 ; Mombrú et al, 2017a , b , c ; Pignanelli et al, 2018 , 2019a , b ). Furthermore, although Raman spectroscopy is quite sensitive to diluted effects such as doping processes of inorganic materials, it is on the other hand, extremely sensitive to doping effects of organic materials such as conducting polymers (Furukawa, 1996 ).…”
Section: Charge Carrier Localizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The CSPE was more thermally stable and showed decreased crystallinity with higher ambient ionic conductivity (1.21 × 10 −4 S cm −1 ) and tensile strength (39.77 MPa) than filler-free electrolyte (σ = 4.72 × 10 −5 S cm −1 ; tensile strength = 38.41 MPa) [13]. Ionic conductivity of PANbased SPE has been shown to increase with the help of an active filler namely lithium titanate nanotubes (LiTNT) [161]. From the vibrational studies, Pignanelli and co-workers observed that the presence of LiTNT in SPE helped in the increment of lithium perchlorate dissociation, whereas the impedance spectroscopy showed two semicircles that are related to lithium-ion conductivity [161].…”
Section: Composite Solid Polymer Electrolytesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ionic conductivity of PANbased SPE has been shown to increase with the help of an active filler namely lithium titanate nanotubes (LiTNT) [161]. From the vibrational studies, Pignanelli and co-workers observed that the presence of LiTNT in SPE helped in the increment of lithium perchlorate dissociation, whereas the impedance spectroscopy showed two semicircles that are related to lithium-ion conductivity [161]. The semicircle in the higher frequency region is accredited to the bulk resistance of lithium transport across the polymer matrix, whereas the second is ascribed to lithium transport through the interaction with the LiTNT [161].…”
Section: Composite Solid Polymer Electrolytesmentioning
confidence: 99%