Literature review: considerations in undertaking focus group research with culturally and linguistically diverse groups

Halcomb, Elizabeth; Gholizadeh, Leila; DiGiacomo, Michelle; Phillips, Jane; Davidson, Patricia M.

doi:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01760.x

Cited by 322 publications

(352 citation statements)

References 45 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

334

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Extensive efforts were taken to conduct culturally appropriate focus groups and analyses as suggested by Halcomb et al, but investigators' interpretation of data may have introduced bias in findings. 19 Further studies involving larger and more diverse populations are necessary to confirm our results.…”

Section: Limitationssupporting

confidence: 57%

“…Participant personal identifiers and names of pharmacy companies were not included in the written text. Written transcripts were coded and analyzed using content analysis as described by Halcomb et al 19 Initially, two investigators compared written notes taken during each focus group session with transcribed text and created preliminary themes. To refine the themes, the same two investigators reviewed the transcripts independently and came together at a later time to reconcile final themes.…”

Section: Data Analysesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Engagement in a Diverse Urban Community to Describe Community Residents’ Perceptions of Pharmacists as Immunizers

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Limitationssupporting

confidence: 57%

Section: Data Analysesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Engagement in a Diverse Urban Community to Describe Community Residents’ Perceptions of Pharmacists as Immunizers

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Focus groups are increasingly used to access marginalized groups who may have inadequate literacy and/or language skills that may exclude them from participating in research utilizing validated instruments (Free et al, 1999;Clark et al, 2003;Halcomb et al, 2007). Altogether five focus groups comprising between two and seven participants were conducted.…”

Section: Design and Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Focus groups have been recommended for use with marginalized groups or with those of limited literacy and/or language in the dominant culture (Halcomb et al, 2007). However, recruitment was problematic and took longer than anticipated.…”

Section: Strengths and Limitations Of The Studymentioning

confidence: 99%

Seen but not heard – ethnic minorities’ views of primary health care interpreting provision: a focus group study

Barron

Holterman

Shipster

et al. 2010

Primary Health Care

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this study was to explore the awareness and views of members of the ethnic minority community towards primary health care interpreting provision in two localities in Hertfordshire. Background: Ethnic minority groups often have to undertake many aspects of their day-today lives with limited English. The provision of high quality language interpretation services is vital for enabling access to public services, including healthcare. The use of accredited or professional interpreters has been minimal within primary care and undermines the principle of equity in the National Health Service. The local Primary Care Trust and ethnic minority forums initiated this study. Methods: The overall research design was qualitative and data collection was undertaken using focus groups. Twenty-four participants from the Pakistani (Punjabi and Urdu speakers), Bangladeshi (Bengali speakers) and Chinese (Cantonese and Mandarin speakers) communities took part in one of five focus groups. Ethnic minority members recruited participants, conducted the focus groups and translated the interviews after receiving in-depth training. Findings: Participants were unaware that healthcare professionals could access interpreting provision for their primary health care consultations, which were usually managed with the assistance of family members (including children) and friends. Both the appropriateness of using children and the potential compromising of confidentiality and privacy when using friends to interpret were concerns. Women discussed inventing illnesses rather than talking openly about embarrassing health issues in front of their children or husbands, which they suggested, may lead to depression or other mental health problems. Trust, accuracy, independence and confidentiality were important attributes participants expected in a professional interpreter whom they would prefer was from their own gender and culture.

show abstract

“…11 Each session followed a semistructured format whereby key questions were asked to prompt discussion (Box 1 and Box 2).…”

Section: Participants and Questionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Perceptions of multidisciplinary case conferencing in residential aged care facilities

Halcomb¹,

Shepherd²,

Griffiths³

2009

Aust. Health Review

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: To explore the understanding about and perceptions of, multidisciplinary case conferencing in residential aged care from the perspective of residential facility staff, residents, carers and general practitioners.Methods: Focus groups and in-depth interviews were conducted with nurses, residents, carers, allied health workers and general practitioners from two residential aged care facilities during February-March 2008. Conversations were analysed using thematic analysis techniques.Results: Thematic analyses highlighted four key themes. Most notably, respondents identified a degree of confusion regarding the purpose of case conferencing and its role in resident health care. The ad hoc development of the conferencing model led to unclear role descriptions for participants that contributed to role confusion and the lack of a collaborative culture. Underpinning much of the discussion was the need for a framework to support the organisation of the conference process. Conclusions:While the process of multidisciplinary case conferencing in residential aged care has significant potential to improve resident care and health outcomes, the development of an explicit framework is required to support the effective conduct of these meetings. Key stakeholders need to be engaged to develop a team approach to conducting case conferences that facilitates the active participation of providers, residents and CURRENT PROJECTIONS OF population ageing in Australia predict an increase from 1.3 million Australians aged over 65 years in 2002, to 2.2 million Australians aged over 65 years by 2020. 1 The increase in those aged over 85 years is projected to nearly double over this period. 1 Current reports suggest that some 6% of Australians aged over 65 years live in residential aged care facilities, with 29.5% of those aged over 85 years requiring residential care or an aged care support package. 2 If current trends in rising chronic and complex disease remain unchanged, the ageing of the population will significantly increase the demand for residential aged care

show abstract

Literature review: considerations in undertaking focus group research with culturally and linguistically diverse groups

Abstract: Focus groups can facilitate increased understanding of perspectives of culturally and linguistically diverse groups and thereby shape clinical practice to better meet the needs of these groups.

Cited by 322 publications

References 45 publications

Engagement in a Diverse Urban Community to Describe Community Residents’ Perceptions of Pharmacists as Immunizers

Engagement in a Diverse Urban Community to Describe Community Residents’ Perceptions of Pharmacists as Immunizers

Seen but not heard – ethnic minorities’ views of primary health care interpreting provision: a focus group study

Perceptions of multidisciplinary case conferencing in residential aged care facilities

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About