1970
DOI: 10.2307/468593
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Literature in the Reader: Affective Stylistics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
66
0
4

Year Published

1989
1989
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 202 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
66
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The children in this study have a good understanding of the formal components of narrative fiction, an appreciation of moral scenarios, an awareness of real world issues, and a facility to read in, between and across fiction and reality. In fact, they do what reader response and audience reception theories suggest adult readers do: they operate within and outside interpretive communities (Fish 1970(Fish , 1976, they inhabit a virtual space (Iser 1976), or secondary world (Benton and Fox 1985) in which the text and their imaginations create the narrative and they negotiate their own meanings from the stimulus of the text and their socio-cultural context (Hall 1973, McQuail 2000.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The children in this study have a good understanding of the formal components of narrative fiction, an appreciation of moral scenarios, an awareness of real world issues, and a facility to read in, between and across fiction and reality. In fact, they do what reader response and audience reception theories suggest adult readers do: they operate within and outside interpretive communities (Fish 1970(Fish , 1976, they inhabit a virtual space (Iser 1976), or secondary world (Benton and Fox 1985) in which the text and their imaginations create the narrative and they negotiate their own meanings from the stimulus of the text and their socio-cultural context (Hall 1973, McQuail 2000.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Richards (1924), Wolfgang Iser (1976), and Stanley Fish (1970) all gives, in varying degrees, status to the 'informed' reader. Although Fish may have recanted the informed reader concept, and we do not argue that only 'informed' readers' views can be considered valid in the study of literary responses, for this study's objectives to be met it was necessary that readers did know something about Matilda and other kinds of heroes, because it would be extremely difficult for them to comment on the ways in which heroes are presented, or the ways in which fictional heroes affect them as readers, if they did not have some prior knowledge.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Efetivamente, na maior parte das vezes só se especulou sobre as reações dos hipotéticos leitores: a estética da recepção de Hans Robert jauss (1979), o "leitor implícito" de Wolfgang Iser (1996), o "leitor informado" de Stanley Fish (1970;1980), o "leitor qualificado" de jonathan Culler (1982;, o "leitor médio" ou "superleitor" de Michael Riffaterre (1971), o "leitor-modelo" (ou leitor-padrão), de Umberto Eco (1984) ou o "leitor-maduro", de Ronald Wardhaugh (1969). Mesmo que qualquer um desses formuladores canônicos da teoria da recepção tivesse em mente uma suposta audiência "real", essa audiência dificilmente pode ser entendida como "comum".…”
Section: Quem Escreve História?unclassified
“…This reorientation of literary study was manifest across a heterogeneous collection of work, rather than advocated by a particular movement. Reader response critics modelled readers in various ways, with notions of the 'implied reader' (Booth, 1961;Iser, 1974); 'ideal reader' (Culler, 1975); 'informed reader' (Fish, 1970); the 'super reader' (Riffaterre, 1966); 'resisting reader' (Fetterley, 1977) and 'communities of readers' (Fish, 1980) emerging in this critical period.…”
Section: The Study Of Reader Responsementioning
confidence: 99%