2018
DOI: 10.34158/onoma.53/2018/1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Literary onomastic theory – An introduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings differ from some experts' findings in various studies that the figure's character corresponds to the name (see, e.g. Gibka & Coates 2018;Hramova 2016). The incompatibility between the name and the character corroborates the allegation that the author only uses the elements of the figure's name in the KPNT to strengthen the symbolisation of Javanese cosmology.…”
Section: Through the Name Of The Figures Element (Anthroponymy)contrasting
confidence: 84%
“…These findings differ from some experts' findings in various studies that the figure's character corresponds to the name (see, e.g. Gibka & Coates 2018;Hramova 2016). The incompatibility between the name and the character corroborates the allegation that the author only uses the elements of the figure's name in the KPNT to strengthen the symbolisation of Javanese cosmology.…”
Section: Through the Name Of The Figures Element (Anthroponymy)contrasting
confidence: 84%
“…Tais características tornam-na objeto de uma variedade de definições e demarcações teóricas. Ela é definida como um ramo da Onomástica (GIBKA; COATES, 2018;GIBKA, 2019;ALGEO, 1992), que busca explicar nomes próprios presentes não só em obras literárias, mas por extensão também em outras formas de criação artística (COATES, 2018). Por vezes também é vista como uma "crítica literária mais especializada, em que os estudiosos estão preocupados com os níveis de significado dos nomes no teatro, poesia, ficção e folclore" (ALVAREZ- ALTMAN, 1981, p. 221).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified