1993
DOI: 10.1080/08838159309364214
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Listserver communication during the gulf war: What kind of medium is the electronic bulletin board?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
15
0
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
4
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Partners in roma ntic relationships were the most likely to eventually meet face to face (57.9%) (statistics adopted from McDowell, 2001). This is confirmed by reports of mail, telephone, photo exchange as additional means for CMC (Parks and Floyd, 1996;Ogan, 1993;Reid, 1991).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Partners in roma ntic relationships were the most likely to eventually meet face to face (57.9%) (statistics adopted from McDowell, 2001). This is confirmed by reports of mail, telephone, photo exchange as additional means for CMC (Parks and Floyd, 1996;Ogan, 1993;Reid, 1991).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Partners in romantic relationships were the most likely to eventually meet face-to-face (57.9% according to McDowell, 2001). This is confirmed by reports of mail, telephone, photo exchange as additional means that supplement computer-mediated communication (Ogan, 1993;Parks & Floyd, 1996;Reid, 1991).…”
Section: Analysis Of Misinformation Detection In the Casesupporting
confidence: 50%
“…Traditional social groups and communities provide many benefits for their members, including opportunities for affiliation or companionship (McClelland 1985, Roberts 1998, Rubenstein and Shaver 1980; opportunities to influence people (Winter 1973); social support (Wellman andWhortley 1989, 1990;Wellman 1990); access to information; the ability to disseminate ideas rapidly (Kaufer and Carley 1993); and support for collective action (Ostrom 1990). Likewise, online social structures provide a variety of benefits by supporting the development of interpersonal relationships, feelings of companionship, and perceptions of affiliation (Furlong 1995, Hiltz 1985, Meyer 1989, Rheingold 1993, Walther 1994; encouraging discussion and knowledge sharing (Abbot 1988, Kraut and Attewell 1993, Wellman 1995; allowing individuals to access information and quickly disseminate their ideas (Constant et al 1996, Finholt and Sproull 1990, Whittaker 1996; providing social and emotional support (King 1994, McCormick and McCormick 1992, Rice and Love 1987, Walther 1996; and enabling collective activities such as software development and political action (Ogan 1993). Whether traditional or computer-mediated, social structures provide a variety of benefits for individual members, enabling them to attract and retain members.…”
Section: Resource Availability Benefit Provision and Sustainabilitymentioning
confidence: 98%