2014
DOI: 10.11120/bmhe.2013.00001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Listening and Learning: Reflections on the use of Audio Feedback. An Excellence in Teaching and Learning Note

Abstract: This note reflects on student perceptions of audio feedback made available via the Virtual Learning Environment (VLE) for various types of assessment. Consistent with action research the study identifies best practice, and highlights issues in relation to implementation. It utilised four case studies where audio feedback was provided to students using the Wimba voice authoring tool within Blackboard Learn+ for various different types of summative assessment feedback. With increased pressures of larger class si… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A majority of students in the audio group felt that the feedback had helped them to know what they had done well, whereas only a small percentage of students in the written feedback selected that statement despite the fact that there was a conscientious effort to match the feedback for content across the audio and feedback groups. Audio feedback has been described as more personal in nature than written feedback because of the nuances that the tutor’s voice can express (Carruthers et al, 2014; Ice et al, 2007). This may explain why the students in the audio group perceived or recalled the praises related to their work better than the students in the written group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A majority of students in the audio group felt that the feedback had helped them to know what they had done well, whereas only a small percentage of students in the written feedback selected that statement despite the fact that there was a conscientious effort to match the feedback for content across the audio and feedback groups. Audio feedback has been described as more personal in nature than written feedback because of the nuances that the tutor’s voice can express (Carruthers et al, 2014; Ice et al, 2007). This may explain why the students in the audio group perceived or recalled the praises related to their work better than the students in the written group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 11 Students have previously reported audio feedback to be accessible, convenient, and personal. 12 Race 1 states the “the voice can be much more encouraging than mere printed or written words.”…”
Section: Novel Initiativementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence mentioned above, social enterprises are supposed to address social issue. Likewise, operating in multiple disciplines may lead to boost in economic growth (Carruthers, McCarron, Bolan, Devine, & McMahon-Beattie, 2014). The fundamental thrust for social enterprise is to envisage social value.…”
Section: Social Entrepreneurmentioning
confidence: 99%