1996
DOI: 10.5962/bhl.title.143200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lista taxonómica de los mamiferos terrestres de México

Abstract: Desde hace 10 años en que se publicó el trabajo de Ramírez-Pulldo et al. (1983), no se ha presentado una lista completa de las especies y subespccies de los mamíferos terrestres de México y en la cual se incorporen los cambios taxonómicos efectuados. Si bien es cierto queen trabajos posteritíres (Ramírez-Pulidoetal., 1986y Ramírez-PulidoyCastro-Campillo, 1990) se mencionaron los cambios taxonéimicos y las nuevas categorías específicas y subespecíficas que fueron publicados durante los lapsos respectivos, la … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
16

Year Published

2000
2000
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
10
0
16
Order By: Relevance
“…Samples contained seeds from at least 19 plant species in six families. Piperaceae were represented by eight species (49.8% of the occurrence, presenceabsence); Moraceae by two subgenera of Ficus (25%); Solanaceae by six species (11.9%); Cecropiaceae by one species (10.4%); Melastomataceae by one species (2.4%); Ramírez-Pulido et al (1996). b Nectar-frugivorous species.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Samples contained seeds from at least 19 plant species in six families. Piperaceae were represented by eight species (49.8% of the occurrence, presenceabsence); Moraceae by two subgenera of Ficus (25%); Solanaceae by six species (11.9%); Cecropiaceae by one species (10.4%); Melastomataceae by one species (2.4%); Ramírez-Pulido et al (1996). b Nectar-frugivorous species.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We studied several Mexican Nearctic species with small dispersal capacities, that are relatively well collected in comparison with other taxa. The geographical distribution of the species was reviewed according to Wilson & Reeder (1993), Ramírez‐Pulido et al . (1996), and Nowak & Paradiso (1999).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of taxa (columns) used in the matrices was 703, corresponding to genera, species and subspecies (classification follows Ramírez‐Pulido et al ., 1996). The number ofareas (rows) varied according to the different units analysed: (1) 716 quadrats of ½° latitude × ½° longitude, (2) 230 quadrats of 1° latitude × 1° longitude, (3) forty‐five ecoregions (two of them did not contain any records) and (4) fourteen biogeographical provinces.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%