2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2008.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Liquidity shocks, size and the relative performance of hedge fund strategies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…*** The coefficients are significantly different from zero at 1%. 17 This finding is consistent with the evidence in studies that show a perceived reduction of index effects over time because of the increased number of investors (including hedge funds) who try to take advantage of it (Ding et al, 2009). the added firm and the incumbents are from the same industry and 0 otherwise.…”
Section: Information Effect Robustness Testsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…*** The coefficients are significantly different from zero at 1%. 17 This finding is consistent with the evidence in studies that show a perceived reduction of index effects over time because of the increased number of investors (including hedge funds) who try to take advantage of it (Ding et al, 2009). the added firm and the incumbents are from the same industry and 0 otherwise.…”
Section: Information Effect Robustness Testsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Lock-up periods are also a good example to emphasize the higher degree of freedom hedge fund managers enjoy in making investment decisions. For example, hedge funds might invest in illiquid positions and capture liquidity risk premiums, actions not allowed to traditional mutual funds (see Ding et al, 2009, for an analysis of liquidity in the hedge fund context). In case of illiquid investments, investors need to be aware that hedge fund managers might smooth their returns (see Getmansky et al, 2004), which might bias performance measurement results.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, abnormal trade pattern could influence an asset price (see Brennan and Subrahmanyam, 1996;Acharya and Pedersen, 2005). In addition, the literature also addresses the effect of liquidity on financial institutions (Ding et al, 2009). …”
Section: Small-bigmentioning
confidence: 99%