2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2015.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Liquidity effects and FFA returns in the international shipping derivatives market

Abstract: The study examines the impact of liquidity risk on freight derivatives returns. The Amihud liquidity ratio and bid-ask spreads are utilized to assess the existence of liquidity risk in the freight derivatives market. Other macroeconomic variables are used to control for market risk. Results indicate that liquidity risk is priced and both liquidity measures have a significant role in determining freight derivatives returns. Consistent with expectations, both liquidity measures are found to have positive and sig… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, market liquidity is important for the absorption of new market information since lower market liquidity can generate a higher illiquidity risk premium, and in turn lead to more pronounced market frictions and slower incorporation of information. In the freight derivatives market, the study of Alizadeh et al (2015) is the only one examining the liquidity of freight futures contracts, using the Amihud illiquidity measure (Amihud, 2002). Although the freight options market is considered less liquid compared to the freight futures market based on trading volumes, there exists no study measuring the relative liquidity of freight options.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, market liquidity is important for the absorption of new market information since lower market liquidity can generate a higher illiquidity risk premium, and in turn lead to more pronounced market frictions and slower incorporation of information. In the freight derivatives market, the study of Alizadeh et al (2015) is the only one examining the liquidity of freight futures contracts, using the Amihud illiquidity measure (Amihud, 2002). Although the freight options market is considered less liquid compared to the freight futures market based on trading volumes, there exists no study measuring the relative liquidity of freight options.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5. According to (Alizadeh et al 2015a), Thursday's FFA prices are used to represent the weekly prices to avoid the possible bias due to the weekend effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an important hedging tool, the forward freight agreement (FFA) plays a significant role in risk management in the dry bulk and tanker markets. An FFA is defined as a cash-settled contract between two counterparties to settle a freight rate for a specified quantity of cargo or hire rate type of vessel in one or a basket of the major shipping routes in the dry bulk and tanker shipping sectors at a certain date in the future (Alizadeh et al, 2015a). Because of its remarkable value for the shipping theory and the industrial practice, FFA draws much attention in the academic field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, in this study we focus on the financial perspective which directly affects the firm's performance. According to [12] financial risks in the shipping sector could be classified as default, credit, market, financial and liquidity. Each category can be quantified by the indicators defined in Table 6.…”
Section: Risk Exposure and Early Warning Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%