2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.118885
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Liquid-state NMR spectroscopy for complex carbohydrate structural analysis: A hitchhiker's guide

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
43
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
4
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Firstly, our tentative assignment of proton signals is based on previous work on polysaccharides and sugar analysis [ 46 , 48 , 49 ]. In the low field region (δ5.4-4.3), 1H NMR spectra ( Figure 7 A) of the EPS show different signals corresponding to the protons from anomeric carbons of sugars, suggesting different types of monosaccharides linkages (α and β) in the EPS structure, as previously described by the FTIR study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Firstly, our tentative assignment of proton signals is based on previous work on polysaccharides and sugar analysis [ 46 , 48 , 49 ]. In the low field region (δ5.4-4.3), 1H NMR spectra ( Figure 7 A) of the EPS show different signals corresponding to the protons from anomeric carbons of sugars, suggesting different types of monosaccharides linkages (α and β) in the EPS structure, as previously described by the FTIR study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the COSY spectrum ( Figure 7 D) its α-configuration by low-field H-1 signal at δ5.34 was found and correlated with H-2 (δ4.0), H-6 (δ3.98 and 3.85), and H-5 (δ4.12) [ 49 ]. The β-glucopyranose units appear at δ4.83 ppm [ 51 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further structural assignment and sequencing of the residues A–F was accomplished based on the key HMBC correlations of H-1 (δH 5.38, A) to C-2 (δC 76.30, B), H-1 (δH 4.97, B) to C-4 (δC 76.01, F), H-1 (δH 4.99, F) to C-4 (δC 76.01, F), H-6 (δH 3.71, F) to C-6 (δC 71.40, E), H-1 (δH 4.97, E) to C-2 (δC 77.20, C), and H-4 (δH 3.68, F) to C-1 (δC 101.69, D) ( Figure 2 e). In addition, the sulfuric group attached to C-4 (δC 76.01, F) was discerned according to the strong deshielding properties of the sulfate substituent influencing the chemical shifts of both 1 H and 13 C nuclei next to the site of attachment [ 21 ], as well as the NMR data and molecular formula analysis of AUM-1. Based on the monosaccharide composition analysis, FT-IR analysis, methylation analysis, and the details of NMR data, the gross structure of AUM-1 was further concluded ( Figure 2 f).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because it plays a very valuable role in analysis of 1D 1 H NMR spectral data, including those shown here, we remind readers about the benefit of using resolution enhancement [e.g., apodization (in MNova) or line broadening (in TopSpin)] of NMR raw FID data. , Enhanced spectra were used in the doping studies of the BA pyrolysis product mixture to enable distinction between minute differences in chemical shifts for the resonances of similar substructural units present in more than one of the compounds shown in Figure .…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%