2015
DOI: 10.1166/jnn.2015.11254
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Liquid-Phase Co-Exfoliated Graphene/MoS2 Nanocomposite for Methanol Gas Sensing

Abstract: We developed an efficient method to co-exfoliate graphite and MoS2 to fabricate graphene/MoS2 nanocomposite. The size, morphology, and crystal structure of the graphene/MoS2 nanocomposite were carefully examined. The as-prepared graphene/MoS2 nanocomposite was fabricated into thin film sensor by a facile drop casting method and tested with methanol gas in various concentrations. The sensitivity, response time, and repeatability of the graphene/MoS2 nanocomposite sensor towards methanol gas were systematically … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it requires multiple complex steps, and thus, the synthesis of the composites is time-consuming. In contrast, the in situ strategy is to form the nanocomposites of MoS 2 and graphene sheets directly through ionic reactions such as chemical vapor deposition (CVD), hydrothermal and solvothermal methods, chemical reduction, and so forth. As compared with the ex situ approach, the in situ approach has the merit that MoS 2 /graphene composites can be obtained with uniform dispersion and architectures . Although CVD, hydrothermal, solvothermal, and chemical reduction methods are the most popular approaches for composite fabrication, they still possess limitations that need to be addressed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it requires multiple complex steps, and thus, the synthesis of the composites is time-consuming. In contrast, the in situ strategy is to form the nanocomposites of MoS 2 and graphene sheets directly through ionic reactions such as chemical vapor deposition (CVD), hydrothermal and solvothermal methods, chemical reduction, and so forth. As compared with the ex situ approach, the in situ approach has the merit that MoS 2 /graphene composites can be obtained with uniform dispersion and architectures . Although CVD, hydrothermal, solvothermal, and chemical reduction methods are the most popular approaches for composite fabrication, they still possess limitations that need to be addressed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Graphene, a representative of 2-D material, has been a focus of scientific research because of its unique property and structure with a unilaminar sp 2 -hybridized carbon atom configuration. In recent years, graphene and reduced graphene oxide (r-GO) have been widely used for gas-sensing investigation due to their large specific surface area and excellent conductivity [ 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 ]. Many researchers reported that metal oxide-decorated graphene nanocomposite-based sensors exhibited superior sensibility to different gases [ 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MoS 2 nanosheet was prepared by MoS 2 powder according to literature [16] with some modifications. Briefly, 300 mg of MoS 2 powders were dispersed in 100 mL of mixtures consisted of acetone and water (v:v, 89:11) to obtain MoS 2 suspension (3 mg mL -1 ).…”
Section: Preparation Of Mos2 Nanosheetmentioning
confidence: 99%