2015
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.5b03692
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Liquid Exfoliated Graphene as Dopant for Improving the Thermoelectric Power Factor of Conductive PEDOT:PSS Nanofilm with Hydrazine Treatment

Abstract: PSS nanofilm). The effects of hydrazine containing concentration, treatment time, and temperature on the electrical conductivity and Seebeck coefficient of PG3 were investigated systematically. An estimated thermoelectric figure of merit (ZT) is 0.05 with the optimized power factor at room temperature.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
57
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
2
57
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The measured thermal conductivity of suspended single layer graphene is around 3000 to 5300 W m −1 K −1 , whose value decreases with increasing number of layers for the suspended sample and approaches very quickly to that of bulk graphite (around 1800 to 2100 W m −1 K −1 ) . However, the thermal conductivity of these carbon‐based nanocomposites is much smaller than the expected value, which therefore has potential applications as thermoelectric materials . CNTs‐ or graphene‐based PANI composites are found to have a relatively low thermal conductivity.…”
Section: Manipulation Of Thermal Conductivitymentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The measured thermal conductivity of suspended single layer graphene is around 3000 to 5300 W m −1 K −1 , whose value decreases with increasing number of layers for the suspended sample and approaches very quickly to that of bulk graphite (around 1800 to 2100 W m −1 K −1 ) . However, the thermal conductivity of these carbon‐based nanocomposites is much smaller than the expected value, which therefore has potential applications as thermoelectric materials . CNTs‐ or graphene‐based PANI composites are found to have a relatively low thermal conductivity.…”
Section: Manipulation Of Thermal Conductivitymentioning
confidence: 93%
“…To highlight the significance of our results, we compare in Figure three main parameters (the preparation time, the applied temperature difference during the TE measurements, and the PF) for the most efficient PEDOT:PSS‐based TE materials from the literature which rely on different fillers or doping: multi‐walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs), single‐walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs), doping treatment with secondary dopants (labeled as “chemicals” in the graph), Te nanorods, and hydrazine treatment of graphene‐doped polymer …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At a graphene loading of 3 wt%, they observed a PF of 45.7 µW m −1 K −2 , higher than that (24.2 µW m −1 K −2 ) of neat PEDOT:PSS. Xu et al incorporated the liquid‐exfoliated graphene into commercial PEDOT:PSS and obtained a PF of 53.5 µW m −1 K −2 at the graphene loading of 3 wt% . Graphene/PANi composites were also been prepared .…”
Section: Compositesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are a couple of different approaches to prepare graphene, such as mechanically exfoliation, CVD growth and chemically reduction of graphene oxide. The preparation approach affects the TE properties of the composites …”
Section: Compositesmentioning
confidence: 99%