1973
DOI: 10.1002/aic.690190502
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Liquid diffusion of nonelectrolytes: Part I

Abstract: tion coefficient theories. The predictions are compared with the experimental results throughout the review. Part I will be followed by Part I1 in November reviewing self-diffusion, empirical predictive equations, and experimental techniques. A supplement of critical tabulations of all experimental diffusion data since 1956 has been prepared.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
0
1

Year Published

1974
1974
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
2
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been found that the Stokes-Einstein equation faits when the solute size (radius) is less than five times that of the solvent (Chen et al, 1981). This supports the observation that values of Stokes radii calculated from 33 and the Stokes-Einstein equation can differ from the actual van der Waals radius of the molecule (Ghai et al, 1973). Significant effort, both from a theoretical and empirical standpoint, has been placed on improving upon the predictive capability of the Stokes-Einstein equation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…It has been found that the Stokes-Einstein equation faits when the solute size (radius) is less than five times that of the solvent (Chen et al, 1981). This supports the observation that values of Stokes radii calculated from 33 and the Stokes-Einstein equation can differ from the actual van der Waals radius of the molecule (Ghai et al, 1973). Significant effort, both from a theoretical and empirical standpoint, has been placed on improving upon the predictive capability of the Stokes-Einstein equation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…The subject of diffusion in liquid nonelectrolytes has been reviewed recently [30]. There are a number of semiempirical relations designed for estimates of diffusion coefficients from viscosities which have been tested with variable success.…”
Section: Analysis and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 2 shows a comparison between the two approaches; Eq. (12) gives undoubtedly the better results (see also Table 1) than Eq. (11).…”
Section: Selection Of Standardsmentioning
confidence: 88%