2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2019.02.111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lipoamino acid-based cerasomes for doxorubicin delivery: Preparation and in vitro evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Under laser confocal microscopy, it can be seen that after 4 h, the cell morphology incubated with mixed nanomicelles began to change significantly, and the change in cell viability affected the absorptive capacity of cells, resulting in less cellular uptake of mixed nanomicelles. In this case, the data confirmed that the novel AMF-loaded mixed micelles we prepared can have a toxic effect on cancer cells in a different way compared with most of the micelles (Bernabeu et al, 2016;Cagel et al, 2017;Hu et al, 2017;Ding et al, 2018;Gileva et al, 2019;Shishir et al, 2019). The factors such as cell type and density, particle size, surface modifying ligands, and surface properties can also affect cellular uptake (Wu et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Under laser confocal microscopy, it can be seen that after 4 h, the cell morphology incubated with mixed nanomicelles began to change significantly, and the change in cell viability affected the absorptive capacity of cells, resulting in less cellular uptake of mixed nanomicelles. In this case, the data confirmed that the novel AMF-loaded mixed micelles we prepared can have a toxic effect on cancer cells in a different way compared with most of the micelles (Bernabeu et al, 2016;Cagel et al, 2017;Hu et al, 2017;Ding et al, 2018;Gileva et al, 2019;Shishir et al, 2019). The factors such as cell type and density, particle size, surface modifying ligands, and surface properties can also affect cellular uptake (Wu et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…The cerasome concept has been alternatively developed by Sebyakin and Gileva with co-workers who developed an L-aspartate-based cerasome forming lipids which were demonstrated to be able to form cerasomes comparable to the original cerasome forming lipids [273,274]. The aspartate-based framework enables simpler selection of hydrophobic tails, since in the original lipid structure the hydrophobic part is based on an amine that is more laborious to synthesize, while providing the opportunity to impart a cationic group in the structure to enable aqueous solubility as well.…”
Section: Cerasomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This drawback has been overcome by varying cerasome lipid composition as primary degradation of lipids provides a pore formation in the siloxane network. On this regard, in vitro studies carried out using MCF‐7 with DOX‐loaded cerasomes with optimized lipid composition (a mixture of cerasome‐forming lipoamino acids (CFLA) and dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine (DPPC) lipid, faster and better accumulation efficiencies as well as higher cytotoxicity levels are found (Gileva et al, ). Additionally, in an attempt to address the pressing demand to find strategies for the delivery of therapeutics, through the blood‐brain barrier (BBB), cerasomes modified with polysorbate 80 (PS 80) for the delivery of curcumin to treat Parkinsons disease (PD), has been reported (N. Zhang, Yan, et al, ).…”
Section: Different Types Of Oinhsmentioning
confidence: 99%