2005
DOI: 10.1179/096805105x37330
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lipid-mediated resistance of Gram-negative bacteria against various pore-forming antimicrobial peptides

Abstract: Lipopolysaccharides (LPSs) play a dual role as target and as effector molecules. The knowledge of the LPS-induced activation of human immune cells is increasing; however, surprisingly, much less effort seems to be directed towards the understanding of the mechanisms leading to the killing of the bacterial organisms, which eventually results in the release of LPS from the bacterial surface into the blood circulation. We demonstrate mechanisms of interaction of peptides of the innate immune system (e.g. defensin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Collaterally, the insensitivity of E. coli under the chosen test conditions might probably result from the amount of peptides sequestered by more bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) due to the higher cell number (7) and/or a changed net charge, structural order, or fluidity of the E. coli inner membrane under the changed physiological conditions during anaerobic growth in minimal medium. The latter growth conditions have been described by other groups to be variables influencing antimicrobial efficiency of AMPs (18,23,42,58).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Collaterally, the insensitivity of E. coli under the chosen test conditions might probably result from the amount of peptides sequestered by more bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) due to the higher cell number (7) and/or a changed net charge, structural order, or fluidity of the E. coli inner membrane under the changed physiological conditions during anaerobic growth in minimal medium. The latter growth conditions have been described by other groups to be variables influencing antimicrobial efficiency of AMPs (18,23,42,58).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we evaluated the resistance of the three mutants to the antimicrobial peptide polymyxin B. A wealth of data indicates that resistance to this peptide reflects well the resistance to other mammalian peptides (29,35,51,75). When the strains were grown at 21°C, the MIC of polymyxin B for the lpxP mutant (0.32 Ϯ 0.04 U/ml) was significantly lower (P Ͻ 0.05) than those for the wild-type and msbB and htrB mutant strains (0.48 Ϯ 0.02, 0.42 Ϯ 0.02, and 0.42 Ϯ 0.03 U/ml, respectively).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these peptides have limitations, being active only at high (μM) concentration (33) and often rendered inactive by bacterial resistance (34,35). The appropriate linking of the recognition protein with a lytic peptide increases the overall antimicrobial activity of the chimera by several-fold over a lytic peptide alone (such as cecropin) or a combination of two lytic peptides (such as cecropin and melittin) with similar modes of action.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%