Lip-splitting in transmandibular resections: Is it really necessary?

Cantù, Giulio; Bimbi, Gabriella; Colombo, Sarah; Compañ, Alvaro; Gilardi, Roberta; Pompilio, Madia; Riccio, Stefano; Rossi, Marco; Squadrelli, Massimo

doi:10.1016/j.oraloncology.2005.11.006

Cited by 32 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Mandibulotomy of the body (median or paramedian), ramus, or the angle should preserve the inferior alveolar nerve as well as the hypoglossal and the lingual nerves although at risk in this approach. Some authors perform a non‐lip‐splitting mandibulotomy omitting the procedure of lower lip‐splitting incision to improve the aesthetic results and to decrease the functional morbidities of the lower lip …”

Section: Surgerymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Some authors perform a non-lipsplitting mandibulotomy omitting the procedure of lower lip-splitting incision to improve the aesthetic results and to decrease the functional morbidities of the lower lip. [47][48][49][50] An infratemporal fossa approach type A, B, or D may be used for tumors involving the skull base or jugular foramen, extending into the infratemporal fossa or with significant intracranial extension ( Figure 5). 9,51 Tumors with invasion of the PPS and the infratemporal fossa with extension to the floor of the middle cranial fossa can be removed by means of the preauricular subtemporal approach with low morbidity.…”

Section: Surgerymentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Contemporary management of primary parapharyngeal space tumors

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The parapharyngeal space is a complex anatomical area. Primary parapharyngeal tumors are rare tumors and 80% of them are benign. A variety of tumor types can develop in this location; most common are salivary gland neoplasm and neurogenic tumors. The management of these tumors has improved greatly owing to the developments in imaging techniques, surgery, and radiotherapy. Most tumors can be removed with a low rate of complications and recurrence. The transcervical approach is the most frequently used. In some cases, minimally invasive approaches may be used alone or in combination with a limited transcervical route, allowing large tumors to be removed by reducing morbidity of expanded approaches. An adequate knowledge of the anatomy and a careful surgical plan is essential to tailor management according to the patient and the tumor. The purpose of the present review was to update current aspects of knowledge related to this more challenging area of tumor occurrence.

show abstract

Section: Surgerymentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Surgerymentioning

confidence: 99%

Contemporary management of primary parapharyngeal space tumors

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In contrast, in the MLR approach, the lower lip and the mandible remain intact, and the mylohyoid muscles and hyomandibular furrow are incised to retract the tongue from the submandibular triangle for resection. Findings in the current literature are contradictory with regard to whether the MLR approach is superior to the MS approach in terms of surgical effectiveness, morbidity, functional recovery, esthetic appearance, survival, and QoL, or vice versa (Devine et al, 2001;Cantu et al, 2006;Dziegielewski et al, 2010;Karatzanis et al, 2012;Tei et al, 2012).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 97%

Mandibular lingual release versus mandibular lip-split approach for expanded resection of middle–late tongue cancer: A case-control study

Yang

et al. 2015

Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…La diminution des sé quelles lié es à la voie d'abord fait aussi partie de ces objectifs. La possibilité de ré aliser tous les types de ré section pelvimandibulaires (anté rieures ou posté rieures) sans interruption labiomentonniè re a é té souligné e ré cemment par Cantù et al [36].…”

Section: 1unclassified