2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.05.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linking pore-scale interfacial curvature to column-scale capillary pressure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
166
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 170 publications
(175 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
7
166
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[10] For the measurement of interfacial curvature we refer to Armstrong et al [2012], and for the measurement of interfacial area we refer to Porter and Wildenschild [2010]. With this approach, we assume that clusters in the pore-space span the pore body and are pinned near the pore neck entry regions and thus, this measurement is an estimate of the average entry capillary pressures that are relevant to a given system of nonwetting phase clusters.…”
Section: Averaging Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10] For the measurement of interfacial curvature we refer to Armstrong et al [2012], and for the measurement of interfacial area we refer to Porter and Wildenschild [2010]. With this approach, we assume that clusters in the pore-space span the pore body and are pinned near the pore neck entry regions and thus, this measurement is an estimate of the average entry capillary pressures that are relevant to a given system of nonwetting phase clusters.…”
Section: Averaging Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2g, h) producing a surface scalar field. This method was originally described by Armstrong et al (2012), and errors in the protocol for the CO 2 -brine-carbonate system addressed by Andrew et al (2014a). Extending this technique to measure the capillary pressure during drainage in this system is, however, challenging.…”
Section: Partially Saturated Imagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Capillary pressure is traditionally measured using techniques such as mercury injection (Purcell 1949), porous plate coreflooding (El-Maghraby and Blunt 2013; Pentland et al 2011) or quasisteady-state coreflooding (Pini et al 2012); however, recent developments have allowed for direct measurement of capillary pressure at the pore-scale through the measurement of the curvature of surfaces generated across the wetting-non-wetting phase interface (Andrew et al 2014a;Armstrong et al 2012). Surfaces were generated using a smoothed marching cubes algorithm, and curvatures found by creating a best-fit quadratic surface for each of the elements across the CO 2 -brine interface (Hege et al 1997;Stalling et al 1998) (Fig.…”
Section: Partially Saturated Imagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measurements of the external pressure, p, required to quantify the externally performed work, may be complemented by in situ estimation of the phase pressures; however, although this method is feasible in principle, it is still under development (37). This approach also includes the disconnected nonwetting phase clusters, through the measurement of the curvature in the liquidliquid menisci by image analysis and by calculating the pressure using the Laplace equation.…”
Section: Energy Dissipation and Upscalingmentioning
confidence: 99%