2022
DOI: 10.1080/02642069.2022.2092615
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linking artificial intelligence to service sabotage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The past study regarded AI as a negative job stressor (Ding, 2021). As a hindrance stressor, AI might deplete employees' resources and then lead to negative attitudes and behaviors (Ma and Ye, 2022). Work withdrawal is considered representative of a range of negative employee outcomes (Chi and Liang, 2013).…”
Section: Theory and Hypothesis Development 21 Conservation Of Resourc...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The past study regarded AI as a negative job stressor (Ding, 2021). As a hindrance stressor, AI might deplete employees' resources and then lead to negative attitudes and behaviors (Ma and Ye, 2022). Work withdrawal is considered representative of a range of negative employee outcomes (Chi and Liang, 2013).…”
Section: Theory and Hypothesis Development 21 Conservation Of Resourc...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, several empirical articles have been done to explore the effects of AI awareness on employee outcomes. For example, Kong et al (2021) found that among hospitality employees, AI awareness was positively related to job burnout and organizational commitment; Ma and Ye (2022) found that AI awareness could cause service sabotage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wynikiem obaw o bycie zastąpionym przez sztuczną inteligencję może być np. sabotaż pracowniczy (Ma i Ye, 2022). Biorąc pod uwagę tak poważne skutki dla organizacji, temat świadomości pracowniczej dotyczącej zastępowalności pracy przez AI można uznać za istotny.…”
Section: Wstępunclassified
“…While the two concepts (i.e., creativity and proactive innovation behavior) share common parts, they emphasize different aspects: the former refers to the development of a creative idea and is more of an individual-level construct associated with weak social ties; the latter places more emphasis on active attitudes and real-time innovative ideas generated in social interaction, which require more supportive resource and emotional arousal (Dang et al, 2021; Fan et al, 2022). As a critical resource for service organization, frontline employee can effectively increase customer satisfaction and service performance through proactive innovation behavior, contributing to the organizational competitiveness in a complex and fast-changing external environment (Dang et al, 2021; Ma & Ye, 2022; Namin et al, 2022). Unfortunately, despite the prevalence of training and incentives, managers fall far from expectations because they know little about how to motivate frontline employees to perform proactive innovation behavior.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%