Proceedings of the Regional Conference on Science, Technology and Social Sciences (RCSTSS 2016) 2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-13-0203-9_40
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linguistic Landscapes in Putrajaya: Competing Codes and Choice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They found that English was more frequent in the two large cities, while in contrast, Malay had a larger presence in the two smaller cities, followed by bilingual signs and a few signs that also included Chinese. More recently, Ariffin et al (2019) studied shop signs in Putrajaya, the administrative capital, south of Kuala Lumpur. They confirmed the pattern of the dominance of both Malay and English in the linguistic landscape, but in their case there was a greater prominence of English due to its placement and the size of the texts.…”
Section: Malaysiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found that English was more frequent in the two large cities, while in contrast, Malay had a larger presence in the two smaller cities, followed by bilingual signs and a few signs that also included Chinese. More recently, Ariffin et al (2019) studied shop signs in Putrajaya, the administrative capital, south of Kuala Lumpur. They confirmed the pattern of the dominance of both Malay and English in the linguistic landscape, but in their case there was a greater prominence of English due to its placement and the size of the texts.…”
Section: Malaysiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for Malaysia, LL is still considered under-researched, although there have been an increasing number of existing research works done. Topic investigated include the vitality of Tamil language in Malaysia Supramani et al (2013); the LL of religious sites in Kuala Lumpur Coluzzi & Kitade (2015); examination of Kuala Lumpur's LL through political, economic, and identity lenses Syed et al (2015); identity construction through the LL of non-native languages like Chinese and Tamil in Kuala Lumpur Wang et al )2017); the presence of Italian within Kuala Lumpur's LL Coluzzi (2016); LL analysis in commercial areas of Putrajaya Ariffin et al (2019); and LL investigation exploring multilingual billboard advertising practices and language policy in Malaysia (Aini, 2017). Most of the studies mentioned merely focus on the urban or metropolitan areas, commercial buildings, and places of worship.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…English words (or other languages) are only permissible if they are not too prominent as compared to BM. However, studies have noted that this is quite wide off the mark (Manan et al, 2015;Hasan et al, 2015;Ariffin et al, 2019;Husin, et al, 2019;Omar et al, 2020). These studies find that other languages, other than BM, are commonly used in the public signs, particularly in the business domains despite the policy solicited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in Malaysia, although BM has been solicited mandatory on public signboards, other languages spoken and recognised by the people in the country, such as English, Mandarin and Tamil and even Korea, Japanese and Spanish, can be found on the signboards. The languages may be used prominently on their own, or combined (Manan et al, 2015;Ariffin et al, 2019;Omar et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%