1996
DOI: 10.1007/bf01499027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linguistic and socioemotional influences on the accuracy of children's reports.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
195
2
2

Year Published

1997
1997
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 219 publications
(209 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
8
195
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, it has been found that children are less accurate when questioned with complex linguistic questions (Carter, Bottoms, & Levine, 1996;Perry, McAuliff, Tam, & Claycomb, 1995). Nonetheless, further studies are needed to better understand these findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, it has been found that children are less accurate when questioned with complex linguistic questions (Carter, Bottoms, & Levine, 1996;Perry, McAuliff, Tam, & Claycomb, 1995). Nonetheless, further studies are needed to better understand these findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A considerable amount of research has examined the effects of rapport-building on child witness recall within an investigative interview (e.g., Almerigogna, Ost, Bull & Akehurst, 2007;Carter, Bottoms & Levine, 1996;Davis & Bottoms, 2002;Hershkowitz, 2011). This research generally supports the notion that a comfortable environment increases child witness recall accuracy and reduces susceptibility to misinformation.…”
Section: Effects Of Rapport-building On Eyewitness Recallmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Child witness research supports the notion that social support (analogous to rapport-building) can enhance children's resistance to suggestion (Carter et al, 1996;Goodman, Bottoms, Rudy & Schwartz-Kenney, 1991). Specifically, Goodman and colleagues (1991) demonstrated that when children were asked misleading questions, those with a socially supportive interviewer were better able to resist the interviewer's misleading suggestions than those interviewed by a socially unsupportive interviewer.…”
Section: Rapport-building and Suggestibilitymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Les chercheurs ont d'abord mesuré des dimensions non verbales du soutien comme une posture ouverte, un sourire, etc., et du non-soutien comme une position fermée du corps, un visage peu expressif, etc. Les résultats de ces études indiquent que le soutien de l'intervieweur a un effet positif, tant sur la quantité que sur l'exactitude des détails donnés par l'enfant (Carter, Bottoms et Levine, 1996 ;Goodman, Bottoms, Schartz-Kenny et Rudy, 1991). En effet, Davis et Bottoms (2002) ont montré que le soutien offert durant des entrevues simulées aide les enfants à résister aux questions suggestives de la part de l'intervieweur sur des évènements passés, augmentant ainsi la qualité du témoignage des enfants.…”
Section: Le Soutien De L'intervieweurunclassified
“…Dans l'étude portant sur le protocole révisé, Hershkowitz et ses collaborateurs (2013) rapportent que les enfants qui reçoivent plus de soutien dans la phase prédéclara-tive de l'entrevue sont aussi ceux qui démontrent moins de résistance dans la phase déclarative. Ces résultats soutiennent donc ceux des autres recherches qui indiquent que les enfants résistants devraient recevoir plus de soutien de la part de l'intervieweur (Carter et al, 1996 ;Goodman et al, 1991 ;Hershkowitz et al, 2006 ;Hershkowitz, Orbach et al, 2007 ;Imhoff et Baker-Ward, 1999).…”
Section: La Résistanceunclassified