2004
DOI: 10.4067/s0034-98872004001100010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linfoma intravascular tratado con anticuerpos monoclonales anti CD20: Descripción de un caso clínico

Abstract: We report a 78 year old male with prostatism, that was subjected to a prostate biopsy. The pathological study showed a microvascular lymphocytic infiltration. Four months later, the patients presented with reduced alertness, cough, dyspnea, fever and elevation of lactic dehydrogenase and erythrocyte sedimentation rate. Chest and abdominal CAT scans, bone marrow aspirate, protein electrophoresis and prostate specific antigen were normal. A re-evaluation of prostate biopsy showed an intravascular lymphoid infilt… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
(6 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Neoplastic cells are rarely seen in bone marrow and peripheral blood smears and so IVLBCL is very difficult to diagnose; most of the cases reported have been confirmed by autopsy or cutaneous biopsies [ 6 ]. IVLBCL diagnosed in prostate specimens is extremely rare in the literature, usually reported as single cases; to the best of our knowledge, this is the 10th such case reported [ 1 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 ]. Furthermore, none of the patients in the study by Murase et al, with a large series of 96 patients, were diagnosed with prostatic involvement, indicating the rarity of infiltration in this site [ 6 ].…”
Section: Discussion and Review Of The Literaturementioning
confidence: 95%
“…Neoplastic cells are rarely seen in bone marrow and peripheral blood smears and so IVLBCL is very difficult to diagnose; most of the cases reported have been confirmed by autopsy or cutaneous biopsies [ 6 ]. IVLBCL diagnosed in prostate specimens is extremely rare in the literature, usually reported as single cases; to the best of our knowledge, this is the 10th such case reported [ 1 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 ]. Furthermore, none of the patients in the study by Murase et al, with a large series of 96 patients, were diagnosed with prostatic involvement, indicating the rarity of infiltration in this site [ 6 ].…”
Section: Discussion and Review Of The Literaturementioning
confidence: 95%