2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2004.01.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linearized vector radiative transfer model MCC++ for a spherical atmosphere

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, MC algorithms are often used as standards in the validation of other methods, particularly in cases that involve complex viewing and/or illumination geometries (Loughman et al 2004;Postylyakov 2004).…”
Section: The Bmc Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, MC algorithms are often used as standards in the validation of other methods, particularly in cases that involve complex viewing and/or illumination geometries (Loughman et al 2004;Postylyakov 2004).…”
Section: The Bmc Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The largest advantage of Monte Carlo models in limb geometry is that they properly take into account Earth´s sphericity both for single and multiple scattering (Oikarinen et al, 1999;Loughman et al, 2004). Furthermore they also provide the possibility to simulate an inhomogeneous atmosphere up to a high degree.…”
Section: Radiative Transfer Model "Tracy-ii"mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1), depends on the scattering angle Θ and the particle size, which for a spherical particle is described by the size parameter x 2πr∕λ, where r is the particle radius. Researchers in atmospheric remote sensing have reported that a scalar theory of light scattering is not sufficient to obtain accurate radiative transfer calculations [31,32]. When polarization effects are ignored, errors are introduced in the calculations of planetary phase functions, and the errors increase with the total scattering angle, defined as the angle between the incident starlight and the observer [33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%