2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-57586-5_36
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linear Search with Terrain-Dependent Speeds

Abstract: We revisit the linear search problem where a robot, initially placed at the origin on an infinite line, tries to locate a stationary target placed at an unknown position on the line. Unlike previous studies, in which the robot travels along the line at a constant speed, we consider settings where the robot's speed can depend on the direction of travel along the line, or on the profile of the terrain, e.g. when the line is inclined, and the robot can accelerate. Our objective is to design search algorithms that… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(24 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the inception of 2 EVAC F2F in [1], numerous search and evacuation-type variants have emerged that studied different robot specs and/or number of searchers, different communication models, and different domains. Some notable examples include search and/or evacuation in the disk with more than 1 exits [29,30], in triangles [31,32], on multiple rays [33], in graphs [34,35], on a line with at least two robots [36,37] (generalizing the seminal result of [38]), with faulty robots [39][40][41] or with probabilistically faulty robots [42], with advice (information) [43], with priority specification on the searchers [44,45], with immobile agents [46,47], with time/energy trade-off requirements [48,49], with speed bounds [50], and with terrain dependent speeds [51], just to name some. The interested reader may also see the recent survey [52] that elaborates more on some selected topics.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the inception of 2 EVAC F2F in [1], numerous search and evacuation-type variants have emerged that studied different robot specs and/or number of searchers, different communication models, and different domains. Some notable examples include search and/or evacuation in the disk with more than 1 exits [29,30], in triangles [31,32], on multiple rays [33], in graphs [34,35], on a line with at least two robots [36,37] (generalizing the seminal result of [38]), with faulty robots [39][40][41] or with probabilistically faulty robots [42], with advice (information) [43], with priority specification on the searchers [44,45], with immobile agents [46,47], with time/energy trade-off requirements [48,49], with speed bounds [50], and with terrain dependent speeds [51], just to name some. The interested reader may also see the recent survey [52] that elaborates more on some selected topics.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Search and evacuation problems with faulty robots have been studied in [22,38,49] and with probabilistically faulty robots in [13]. Variations pertaining to the searcher's speeds appeared in [36,37] (immobile agents), in [44] (speed bounds) and in [26] (terrain dependent speeds). Search for multiple exits was considered in [28,50], while variation of searching with advice appeared in [40].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the inception of 2 EVAC F2F in [1], numerous search and evacuation-type variants have emerged that studied different robot specs and/or number of searchers, different communication models, and different domains. Some notable examples include search and/or evacuation in the disk with more than 1 exits [29,30], in triangles [31,32], on multiple rays [33], in graphs [34,35], on a line with at least two robots [36,37] (generalizing the seminal result of [38]), with faulty robots [39][40][41] or with probabilistically faulty robots [42], with advice (information) [43], with priority specification on the searchers [44,45], with immobile agents [46,47], with time/energy trade-off requirements [48,49], with speed bounds [50], and with terrain dependent speeds [51], just to name some. The interested reader may also see the recent survey [52] that elaborates more on some selected topics.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%