2004
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9399(2004)130:4(511)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linear Quadratic Gaussian-Alpha Control with Relative Stability and Gain Parameter for the Structural Benchmark Problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The EBP algorithm is implemented on an SATMD with variable damping device, and its efficacy is evaluated by implementing the SATMD for the response control of a 76‐story wind‐excited benchmark building. The performances of various other control strategies involving SATMDs and ATMDs have previously been investigated and reported by researchers for the benchmark building (Battaini, Casciati, & Faravelli, ; Deshmukh & Chandiramani, ; Kang et al., ; Kim, Yun, & Spencer, ; Mei, Kareem, & Kantor, ; Peng, Gu, & Niemann, ; Pham, Jin, Sain, Spencer, & Liberty, ; Varadarajan & Nagarajaiah, ; Wang, ; Wang & Adeli, ; Wu & Yang, ; Yang et al., ; Yang, Lin, & Jabbari, ). The fundamental time period of the uncontrolled 76‐story building is 6.25 s. The mass of the SATMD used in this investigation is 500 t, which is similar to what is used by previously proposed strategies.…”
Section: Numerical Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The EBP algorithm is implemented on an SATMD with variable damping device, and its efficacy is evaluated by implementing the SATMD for the response control of a 76‐story wind‐excited benchmark building. The performances of various other control strategies involving SATMDs and ATMDs have previously been investigated and reported by researchers for the benchmark building (Battaini, Casciati, & Faravelli, ; Deshmukh & Chandiramani, ; Kang et al., ; Kim, Yun, & Spencer, ; Mei, Kareem, & Kantor, ; Peng, Gu, & Niemann, ; Pham, Jin, Sain, Spencer, & Liberty, ; Varadarajan & Nagarajaiah, ; Wang, ; Wang & Adeli, ; Wu & Yang, ; Yang et al., ; Yang, Lin, & Jabbari, ). The fundamental time period of the uncontrolled 76‐story building is 6.25 s. The mass of the SATMD used in this investigation is 500 t, which is similar to what is used by previously proposed strategies.…”
Section: Numerical Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(); balanced LQG (BLQG) controller and the extension of BLQG using second‐cost‐cumulant (2CC) generalization of the popular LQG proposed by Pham et al. (); linear quadratic Gaussian‐alpha (LQG‐ α ) control strategy developed by Wang (); modified sliding mode control (MSMC) scheme proposed by Wu and Yang (); energy‐to‐peak based (E‐PB) control and peak‐to‐peak based (P‐PB) strategies proposed by Yang et al (); and filtered sliding mode control (Filtered SMC) proposed by Wang and Adeli ().…”
Section: Numerical Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous applications of linear quadratic regulator (LQR) and linear quadratic Gaussian (LQG) methods in structural control have been proposed 1–3. LQR and LQG controllers are typically the baseline against which new approaches are judged 4–6, and some investigations have focused on enhancing these methodologies to improve system performance in the time domain 7, 8.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wang (2003) proposed an active control approach for structural systems with uncertainties in model parameters by combining a robust state feedback control and a modifi ed Kalman fi lter. In 2004, Wang (2004) further proposed a modifi ed LQG control method, known as the LQG-α method, by introducing a relative stability vector and a gain parameter. Yang et al (2004) proposed two H ∞ -based control strategies for civil engineering structures in which the peak values of the control resources were penalized or constrained.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%