2008 49th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science 2008
DOI: 10.1109/focs.2008.74
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linear Level Lasserre Lower Bounds for Certain k-CSPs

Abstract: We show that for k ≥ 3 even the Ω(n) level of the Lasserre hierarchy cannot disprove a random k-CSP instance over any predicate type implied by k-XOR constraints, for example k-SAT or k-XOR. (One constant is said to imply another if the latter is true whenever the former is. For example k-XOR constraints imply k-CNF constraints.) As a result the Ω(n) level Lasserre relaxation fails to approximate such CSPs better than the trivial, random algorithm. As corollaries, we obtain Ω(n) level integrality gaps for the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
222
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 215 publications
(232 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
9
222
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Proof: Note that Schoenebeck [37] has proven precisely this theorem in the case that k = t; i.e., when P is simply the t-ary XOR predicate. 1 In particular, one can view his proof as constructing an appropriate "pseudoexpectation" operator E[·] (see [22]) for degree2r polynomials under which all t-XOR constraints are satisfied with "pseudoprobability 1".…”
Section: Security Against Lasserre/parrilo Attacksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proof: Note that Schoenebeck [37] has proven precisely this theorem in the case that k = t; i.e., when P is simply the t-ary XOR predicate. 1 In particular, one can view his proof as constructing an appropriate "pseudoexpectation" operator E[·] (see [22]) for degree2r polynomials under which all t-XOR constraints are satisfied with "pseudoprobability 1".…”
Section: Security Against Lasserre/parrilo Attacksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This situation is similar to the very strong SDP gaps known for problems such as 3-XOR (see [14], [17]) for which deciding complete satisfiability is easy.…”
Section: Our Resultsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Random CSP is extensively studied due to its importance to average-case complexity, probability and statistical physics [MZK + 99], cryptography [ABW10], hardness of approximation [Fei02] and other fields. It is also a prototypical example of a hard CSP [Gri01,Sch08]. Random Label-Cover, i.e., random approximate CSP, is therefore a natural object for study.…”
Section: Label-covermentioning
confidence: 99%