1980
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.45.21
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linear Electro-Optic Effect in Gases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Electric Rayleigh optical activity was first observed in 1980 in gaseous methyl chloride [158], but no electric ROA analogue has been observed to date.…”
Section: Discussion and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Electric Rayleigh optical activity was first observed in 1980 in gaseous methyl chloride [158], but no electric ROA analogue has been observed to date.…”
Section: Discussion and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…for the achiral molecule CH 3 Cl (methyl chloride whose symmetry is described by the point group 3m(C 3V ) ) [40] giving a contribution to U m T which in our case is forbidden. In accordance with Refs.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 75%
“…It has been shown [2] that the interaction between macroscopic nondissipative media and time-varying electromagnetic fields can be described by a time-averaged potential function, the free energy density. Knowing this energy we can find an expression describing the static macroscopic electric polarization which, after comparing with (39) and (40), enables us to check that the nonlinear polarizabilities …”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the complex polarisability (Xoef3 is unaffected by a reversal of the orientation of the molecule, and since reversal of an externally applied electric field F reverses the mean orientation of molecular dipoles, it might be expected that there is no linear effect of F on the optical properties of a fluid. However, there is a small linear effect of Fx on the intensity of circularly polarised light propagating in the z direction that is scattered in the y direction (Buckingham and Raab 1975;Buckingham and Shatwell 1980). This differential scattering-of the order of 1 part per million in a field of 10 6 Vm-1 -comes from the interference of the radiation from the induced electric dipole with that from the induced magnetic dipole and electric quadrupole in the polarised fluid.…”
Section: Re8ection From a Polarised Surfacementioning
confidence: 99%