2012
DOI: 10.1117/12.916310
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Line-pattern collapse mitigation status for EUV at 32nm HP and below

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Modeling of the collapse in photoresist structures has continued, with Chini and Amirfazli (9) deriving a formulation using a method similar to Tanaka et al (8), but also incorporating secondary effects such the bending of the feature changing the effective contact angle, and a rudimentary initial investigation of 3D effects. Yoshimoto et al (10) included plastic deformation of the photoresist into a model to predict the collapse of photoresist features, and Carcasi et al (11) looked at predicting photoresist pattern collapse with a model that accounted for the outer layer of photoresist becoming softer due to adsorption of the wetting liquid.…”
Section: Modeling Of Photoresist Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modeling of the collapse in photoresist structures has continued, with Chini and Amirfazli (9) deriving a formulation using a method similar to Tanaka et al (8), but also incorporating secondary effects such the bending of the feature changing the effective contact angle, and a rudimentary initial investigation of 3D effects. Yoshimoto et al (10) included plastic deformation of the photoresist into a model to predict the collapse of photoresist features, and Carcasi et al (11) looked at predicting photoresist pattern collapse with a model that accounted for the outer layer of photoresist becoming softer due to adsorption of the wetting liquid.…”
Section: Modeling Of Photoresist Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 However, the photoresist (PR) for a shorter wavelength has to be thinner and softer with respect to the dry etch process because the shorter wavelength has a higher opacity and a lower depth of focus. A shorter wavelength for a scanner is needed to increase the resolution of photolithography.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%