2015
DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01272
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limits to Dihydrogen Incorporation into Electron Sinks Alternative to Methanogenesis in Ruminal Fermentation

Abstract: Research is being conducted with the objective of decreasing methane (CH4) production in the rumen, as methane emissions from ruminants are environmentally damaging and a loss of digestible energy to ruminants. Inhibiting ruminal methanogenesis generally results in accumulation of dihydrogen (H2), which is energetically inefficient and can inhibit fermentation. It would be nutritionally beneficial to incorporate accumulated H2 into propionate or butyrate production, or reductive acetogenesis. The objective of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Increased hydrogen helps to redirect it into alternative sinks, such as propiogenesis . However, that sink may not efficiently incorporate all released hydrogen from methane inhibition because reactions of reductive propiogenesis have Gibbs energy changes that are similar to those of ATP generation …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increased hydrogen helps to redirect it into alternative sinks, such as propiogenesis . However, that sink may not efficiently incorporate all released hydrogen from methane inhibition because reactions of reductive propiogenesis have Gibbs energy changes that are similar to those of ATP generation …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 48 h batch cultures, there were distinct effects of pH and substrate composition (hay or cracked corn) on H 2 , CH 4 and the acetate to propionate ratio (Russell, 1998), which can also be interpreted as an indication of an effect of the rate of fermentation per se independent of outflow rates or pH. It has also been speculated that the evolution of rumen H 2incorporating hydrogenases in the rumen environment with low H 2 concentration may have resulted in low K m but also low V max for H 2 (Ungerfeld, 2015a). This idea, however, does not agree with the high frequency of genomes of rumen organisms encoding [FeFe]-hydrogenases, and the high abundance of transcripts of various types of [FeFe]-hydrogenases in sheep rumens (Greening et al, 2019), as [FeFe]-hydrogenases have higher V max and K m for H 2 uptake than [NiFe] hydrogenases (Frey, 2002).…”
Section: The Control Of the Rumen Fermentation Profilementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The incorporation of [H] into pathways alternative to methanogenesis can be limited by enzyme or substrate kinetics, or thermodynamics (Ungerfeld, 2015a). The addition of an e − acceptor that can be metabolized to VFA can help removing substrate kinetics or thermodynamic constraints.…”
Section: The Competition For Dihydrogenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although methanogens are the main H 2 consumers, due to the thermodynamically favorable pathway of CH 4 formation, there are rumen bacteria, which are also able to use H 2 as substrate thus generating alternative end products ( Leng, 2014 ). Thus, when CH 4 production is decreased, [H] might be redirected into alternative sinks nutritionally useful for the ruminant ( Ungerfeld, 2015a ). However, an excessive increase of the H 2 partial pressure in the rumen after methane inhibition might have detrimental effects on rumen function ( Wolin et al, 1997 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%