2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2005.04.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limits on recovery in the corticospinal tract of the rat: Partial lesions impair skilled reaching and the topographic representation of the forelimb in motor cortex

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
31
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
4
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interruption of CST input to the cervical spinal cord resulted in a permanent impairment of skilled forelimb function as shown in previous studies (Whishaw et al, 1993;Piecharka et al, 2005). The same result was obtained in injured rats with immobilized impaired forelimbs.…”
Section: Forced Limb Use Leads To Functional Recoverysupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Interruption of CST input to the cervical spinal cord resulted in a permanent impairment of skilled forelimb function as shown in previous studies (Whishaw et al, 1993;Piecharka et al, 2005). The same result was obtained in injured rats with immobilized impaired forelimbs.…”
Section: Forced Limb Use Leads To Functional Recoverysupporting
confidence: 86%
“…[51][52][53] In standard ICMS studies, forelimb movements can be evoked at ÂŁ60 uA. [37][38][39][54][55][56] However, we and others have previously found that post-CCI of the CMS requires higher current to drive ICMS-evoked movements. 57,58 The fact that wrist and elbow movements are primarily elicited above 60 uA indicates that, even 41 days post-CCI, the motor cortex is highly dysfunctional, further supporting our previous findings that dendrites in peri-injury remaining MC are sparse, and NOGO is upregulated compared to control animals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These skillful voluntary forepaw movements require training prior to injury, and involve more supraspinal descending inputs than unskilled movement such as reflex or postural support movements (Alaverdashvili and Whishaw, 2008;Anderson et al, 2007;McKenna and Whishaw, 1999;Zai et al, 2009). The supraspinal descending tracts involved in skilled forepaw movement include the corticospinal Piecharka et al, 2005;Starkey et al, 2005), and rubrospinal tracts (McKenna and Whishaw, 1999;Whishaw et al, 1998), with the latter being more important for digit movements in rats (Kuchler et al, 2002). In this study we report that SCI significantly reduced the number of ipsilateral forepaw adjustments made per piece of vermicelli, a result consistent with previous literature in which this test was used to assess functional recovery after unilateral middle cerebral artery occlusion, an electrolytic somatosensory cortex lesion, or a striatal dopamine-depleting lesion (Allred et al, 2008).…”
Section: Assessment Of Skilled and Unskilled Behavioral Tasksmentioning
confidence: 99%